In 2019 I received a court citation for defaulting on student loans from the mid to late 90s - I was unaware I had defaulted, especially given HRMC was taking SL repayments after I started a new job the previous year.
Throughout my dealings with Erudio's solicitors Shoosmiths, I thought their client was in the wrong for failing to send deferral papers. I repeated this assertion repeated but Shoosmiths and Erudio never responded. I believed I had never changed my contact address.
Then last year a FOI revealed that I was wrong. I had changed my address in 2014 - I have no recollection of this but years of taking a variety of medications will do that to the memory.
After the shame and embarrassment of my costly mistake dissipated it was replaced with anger, anger that Erudio hadn't produced this document 5 years ago, the anxiety, the bouts of depression and insomnia sparked by their lack of communication could have been avoided, their impact lessened.
With that firmly in mind I've decided I want to pay Erudio off and end this nightmare - something I would have sought to done five years ago if only I had known. To do this I'll have to take out another loan from a third party.
I have never reached the threshold for repayment and I don't have any savings or assets. I'm also having to factor in the unknown but considerable cost of private treatment for a condition that precludes me from working full-time. My current total is approx £6,500 - not including any interest garnered in the last 5 years.
Given I'm going to be paying one lump sum, and given this could have been settled 5 years ago, my instinct is to offer less than the total, and if that's refused go to court (Erudio awarded me £100 for repeatedly ignoring my questions but never paid, that was over two years ago).
If it went to court would any of my complaints, treatment at their hands matter or is it just black and white, you were wrong, pay what we say and we'll treat you however we like, leave the interest metre ticking and get away with it?
Were Erudio just being their usual unprofessional, inept selves and never thought to check my file, or did they knowingly ignore the change of address document and by doing so kept the file open and the interest metre running?
Any advice would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Throughout my dealings with Erudio's solicitors Shoosmiths, I thought their client was in the wrong for failing to send deferral papers. I repeated this assertion repeated but Shoosmiths and Erudio never responded. I believed I had never changed my contact address.
Then last year a FOI revealed that I was wrong. I had changed my address in 2014 - I have no recollection of this but years of taking a variety of medications will do that to the memory.
After the shame and embarrassment of my costly mistake dissipated it was replaced with anger, anger that Erudio hadn't produced this document 5 years ago, the anxiety, the bouts of depression and insomnia sparked by their lack of communication could have been avoided, their impact lessened.
With that firmly in mind I've decided I want to pay Erudio off and end this nightmare - something I would have sought to done five years ago if only I had known. To do this I'll have to take out another loan from a third party.
I have never reached the threshold for repayment and I don't have any savings or assets. I'm also having to factor in the unknown but considerable cost of private treatment for a condition that precludes me from working full-time. My current total is approx £6,500 - not including any interest garnered in the last 5 years.
Given I'm going to be paying one lump sum, and given this could have been settled 5 years ago, my instinct is to offer less than the total, and if that's refused go to court (Erudio awarded me £100 for repeatedly ignoring my questions but never paid, that was over two years ago).
If it went to court would any of my complaints, treatment at their hands matter or is it just black and white, you were wrong, pay what we say and we'll treat you however we like, leave the interest metre ticking and get away with it?
Were Erudio just being their usual unprofessional, inept selves and never thought to check my file, or did they knowingly ignore the change of address document and by doing so kept the file open and the interest metre running?
Any advice would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Comment