I need advice, please. Last July (2023), I cancelled my children's weekly swimming lessons at our local leisure centre. However, I recently discovered that payments of £55.80 have been deducted from my husband's account every month since then. It seems the cancellation wasn't processed, and the staff member I initially spoke with has left the business. This was an oversight on our part, but it's concerning that nobody at the centre noticed our children's absence from the lessons for over six months. Earlier this week, I requested an immediate cancellation from the centre. They sent me a refund form, which I completed, asking for £334.80. Now, I've received a response from the centre stating:
“in the event of cancellation, the customer is required to also cancel the Direct Debit with the bank - this is to protect the customer against any error that may occur.
To conclude, I believe that there is potential justification for a partial refund - but not a full refund.
I would be happy to offer you a £167.40 refund as a goodwill gesture.”
My dilemma is whether to accept the partial refund and consider it a costly lesson learned, or if there is legal grounds to argue that the continuous deductions went unnoticed by the center staff, suggesting a communication lapse or oversight on their part. Additionally, I question if there's justification for the failure to provide the agreed-upon services and the inconvenience caused.
“in the event of cancellation, the customer is required to also cancel the Direct Debit with the bank - this is to protect the customer against any error that may occur.
To conclude, I believe that there is potential justification for a partial refund - but not a full refund.
I would be happy to offer you a £167.40 refund as a goodwill gesture.”
My dilemma is whether to accept the partial refund and consider it a costly lesson learned, or if there is legal grounds to argue that the continuous deductions went unnoticed by the center staff, suggesting a communication lapse or oversight on their part. Additionally, I question if there's justification for the failure to provide the agreed-upon services and the inconvenience caused.
Comment