• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Assault...Lawyer or No lawyer?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Assault...Lawyer or No lawyer?

    Hello...[first time here; & chose this welcome forum (didn't see an appropriate category anywhere else...sorry if this is the wrong place)].

    So...I was assaulted by an individual...grabbed by the neck & hurled to the floor, which resulted in my fracturing an existing left hip replacement. I had 6 favorable witnesses (who indicated that the individual attacked me, without me laying a hand on him). The police took 4 witness statements only, & decided they had enough to send the case to the county prosecutor’s office. I am out of work for about 2-1/2 months.

    The police officer who videotaped my statement told me that I needed an attorney, regardless of whether or not I needed to be compensated for lost wages or outstanding medical bills.

    A friend of mine, whose Father was an attorney told me that: A) The police officer is in error…I do not need a lawyer, in general...the DA acts as my attorney. B) The prosecutor’s office will ask me (as part of the assault case) if I had any financial losses as a result of the attack (medical bills, lost wages, etc.)...will ask for records of those losses; & will add those losses to the case, so that I am compensated financially if I am successful.

    I cannot afford an attorney at this time (out of work, due to the attack & running a low bank account balance as a result); & at this point, do not know who to believe. Anyone here w/ experience of this nature?...sure could use some advice.

    thanx in advance,


    mark4man

    Also…not sure if this is relative…dropped off medical records today at the police station (to be forwarded to the prosecutor’s office); & they showed me what looked like a mug shot of the individual (full facial close up); & asked me to positively identify him (which I did). I then asked offhand the origin of the photo, to which they replied they could not divulge that information. So, I am assuming he has been arrested, or summoned for questions.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Looking at spellings etc I think you are in the USA - we are a UK law forum only, sorry. If you are in the UK please correct my assumption! Good luck

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X