I'm not familiar with those cases, I would have to read them for context but it seems like they all relate to service of a notice of ground rent/charges. However, what they appear to have failed to take into account is that the grounds for setting aside the judgment is based on invalid service of the claim form. The Civil Procedure Rules govern service of the claim form which is different to service of a demand for rent/charges - whilst the demand may be considered valid service, they do not extend to service of the claim form and therefore they must comply with the provisions/case law of CPR.
I will have a look later today at those cases and confirm but that's my first instinct.
What does the other email say about their offer to set aside
I will have a look later today at those cases and confirm but that's my first instinct.
What does the other email say about their offer to set aside
Comment