Tweet
Hi Everyone,
with reference to previous posts on here and very recently Pelotas.
Similarly we (both myself and my husband) have received letters before claim on 30/9/21, from VCS Ltd. It is relating to a a "parking charge" reason- 46 - stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited- "offence" 2/1/2018. It was a cold, rainy dark winter's night and we could not read the signs at all. We stopped both cars, as we missed the short term pay entrance due to the terrible weather conditions, for approximately 20 seconds to drop off passengers. All signage that we had passed was on the entrance road into the airport, but required stopping at, as you said to read it! The original NTK was received by both my husband and myself in Early January 2018 with photographic evidence of said "offence".- which we no longer have. It is the exact same form as previously posted from Pelotas et al posted on this forum. My husband responded by appealing through their channels which was rejected (no surprise) however, he neglected to name the driver of his vehicle. I have ignored all letters in connection with the alleged "incident" be it from VCS, DRP, Zenith, DCBL all along the way. We have disclosed no further information, and also there has been a big gap in dates of letters etc.
Accompanying the letter before claim is: a general info sheet, referring to seeking debt advice, reply form acknowledging the debt/disputing the debt or some ownership in part to the debt.From other research I have read, in order for this to proceed legally, the LBC should have also contained a debt PAP (Pre Action Protocol for debt claims).
I would also appreciate some advice about how to proceed and whether this LBC actually has some legal leverage.
Thanks.
with reference to previous posts on here and very recently Pelotas.
Similarly we (both myself and my husband) have received letters before claim on 30/9/21, from VCS Ltd. It is relating to a a "parking charge" reason- 46 - stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited- "offence" 2/1/2018. It was a cold, rainy dark winter's night and we could not read the signs at all. We stopped both cars, as we missed the short term pay entrance due to the terrible weather conditions, for approximately 20 seconds to drop off passengers. All signage that we had passed was on the entrance road into the airport, but required stopping at, as you said to read it! The original NTK was received by both my husband and myself in Early January 2018 with photographic evidence of said "offence".- which we no longer have. It is the exact same form as previously posted from Pelotas et al posted on this forum. My husband responded by appealing through their channels which was rejected (no surprise) however, he neglected to name the driver of his vehicle. I have ignored all letters in connection with the alleged "incident" be it from VCS, DRP, Zenith, DCBL all along the way. We have disclosed no further information, and also there has been a big gap in dates of letters etc.
Accompanying the letter before claim is: a general info sheet, referring to seeking debt advice, reply form acknowledging the debt/disputing the debt or some ownership in part to the debt.From other research I have read, in order for this to proceed legally, the LBC should have also contained a debt PAP (Pre Action Protocol for debt claims).
I would also appreciate some advice about how to proceed and whether this LBC actually has some legal leverage.
Thanks.
Comment