• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Benefits fraud

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Benefits fraud

    Hi
    my ex partner has just received a letter from DWP Someone has reported him for working whilst on invalidity benefits.
    we split New Year’s Eve 2020. He left for someone he met on tinder!
    The house has sold and we are days away from signing the exchange contracts. Because he’s been reported for benefit fraud he wants to stop the sale of the house. He says that I should be paying his fine/overpayment with him because I’ve used his money as well. I’ve worked full time all the way through our relationship and went straight back to work as soon as I had children.
    will the DWP take the proceeds from the house to pay back his fine or will they take it weekly/monthly from him? If he wants to stop the sale can I still go ahead with the sale though? Confused and worried!
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Hi Mavis

    I think your ex partner is using the house sale as 'leverage', so the fine comes out of the proceeds rather then from him. It's not a great situation for you. I'm sure others here can provide concrete advice then I can on this.

    Nevertheless here's some info - https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/be...-overpayments/
    Last edited by echat11; 11th July 2021, 13:37:PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      If you have the normal arrangement for the house then it will be tenants in common and you actually own half of it. They can't take from that half, only his. Though no doubt they will try.

      Comment


      • #4
        We never married. Would that make a difference?

        Comment


        • #5
          You would still probably be tenants in common, though not neccessarily so.

          As two separate legal entities there's even less reason to take your portion

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ostell View Post
            You would still probably be tenants in common, though not neccessarily so.

            As two separate legal entities there's even less reason to take your portion
            I concur

            Comment

            View our Terms and Conditions

            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
            Working...
            X