Hello, I am new to the forum so thanks for accepting me as a member. I was diverted to this site while reading the pro's and cons of the MIB website.
My wife parked her Mercedes outside of her workplace and later found her car had substantial damage to the front O/S (Hit and Run) ,no one had seen the incident and she immediately phoned the police who would only give a crime number. We followed the necessary insurance requirements etc.
It was suggested by the Police to apply to the MIB for reimbursement of our insurance excess , now the MIB rejected the claim under Clause 7 (1) 'they won't cover damage by an unidentified motor vehicle'... ???
It sounds wrong , does anyone know about this 'clause' and has anyone had the same reply ?
I would appreciate any feedback.
My wife parked her Mercedes outside of her workplace and later found her car had substantial damage to the front O/S (Hit and Run) ,no one had seen the incident and she immediately phoned the police who would only give a crime number. We followed the necessary insurance requirements etc.
It was suggested by the Police to apply to the MIB for reimbursement of our insurance excess , now the MIB rejected the claim under Clause 7 (1) 'they won't cover damage by an unidentified motor vehicle'... ???
It sounds wrong , does anyone know about this 'clause' and has anyone had the same reply ?
I would appreciate any feedback.
Comment