Hi all - I'm after some advice regarding a relatively large bill issued from a solicitor following an initial meeting, regarding estate planning, where there was no agreement or instruction in place, and also nothing particularly specific discussed:
I'd booked an initial meeting with the solicitor, who was a recommended to me from a family friend, to discuss estate/IHT planning for a parent. At no point prior to the meeting or during the meeting were fees discussed and, as far as I was concerned, the meeting was to establish whether the solicitor was the right type of advisor to assist in our case. There was also no draft agreement or instruction sent to us prior to the meeting. The meeting lasted about 45 minutes and we did discuss general IHT rules and strategies but nothing really specific to our situation, and nothing of use in terms of actual decision making for us. It became apparent during the meeting that the solicitor wasn't the right type of advisor for us.
A couple of weeks later we received a draft agreement and summary of what was discussed during the meeting by mail. The draft agreement was covered the call we'd had two weeks prior, as well as the written summary, at a cost of £1200 inc VAT.
IMHO the fee seems fairly unreasonable for the service, especially given that there was no useful advice given, but more importantly is there not a requirement for a law firm to disclose what they'll charge prior to any engagement? The SRA appears to suggest so, but I don't have a feel for how binding their conduct guidelines are. In this case especially, the solicitor has indicated that the £1200 fee is a fixed fee so clearly this would've been a triviality to disclose prior to any engagement.
I'm really not familiar at all with how solicitor fees work but asking me to be bound to an agreement after the fact when no fee was discussed at any point seems a bit absurd to me. As in, what's to stop fees being completely unbounded?
I'm certainly not planning to sign that agreement in its current form but I would like to know if there's a smart way to push back here. I feel like I'm in a relatively strong position given there's obviously no signed contract in place between myself and the firm.
Hope someone is able to offer some advice here!
Thanks!
I'd booked an initial meeting with the solicitor, who was a recommended to me from a family friend, to discuss estate/IHT planning for a parent. At no point prior to the meeting or during the meeting were fees discussed and, as far as I was concerned, the meeting was to establish whether the solicitor was the right type of advisor to assist in our case. There was also no draft agreement or instruction sent to us prior to the meeting. The meeting lasted about 45 minutes and we did discuss general IHT rules and strategies but nothing really specific to our situation, and nothing of use in terms of actual decision making for us. It became apparent during the meeting that the solicitor wasn't the right type of advisor for us.
A couple of weeks later we received a draft agreement and summary of what was discussed during the meeting by mail. The draft agreement was covered the call we'd had two weeks prior, as well as the written summary, at a cost of £1200 inc VAT.
IMHO the fee seems fairly unreasonable for the service, especially given that there was no useful advice given, but more importantly is there not a requirement for a law firm to disclose what they'll charge prior to any engagement? The SRA appears to suggest so, but I don't have a feel for how binding their conduct guidelines are. In this case especially, the solicitor has indicated that the £1200 fee is a fixed fee so clearly this would've been a triviality to disclose prior to any engagement.
I'm really not familiar at all with how solicitor fees work but asking me to be bound to an agreement after the fact when no fee was discussed at any point seems a bit absurd to me. As in, what's to stop fees being completely unbounded?
I'm certainly not planning to sign that agreement in its current form but I would like to know if there's a smart way to push back here. I feel like I'm in a relatively strong position given there's obviously no signed contract in place between myself and the firm.
Hope someone is able to offer some advice here!
Thanks!
Comment