Hi
i purchased legal expense policy with LV=. Unfortunately I have had a no fault accident and need to use the policy. LV= use a third party company and the solicitor they provided has proven to be incompetent. I complained to LV= and registered a complaint. They redirected me back to their 3rd party. I explained my problem and said my contract was with LV= and that I had paid them a sum to provide legal expense, it was their choice to sub contract this out. As an example I said that when I purchase an item from amazon and their delivery provider fails I go back to amazon not the delivery firm as amazon have the obligation to deliver. I believe that this reflects the legal position I have with LV=. First of all am I correct? Secondly is there any contract case law that I can refer to that supports this?
i purchased legal expense policy with LV=. Unfortunately I have had a no fault accident and need to use the policy. LV= use a third party company and the solicitor they provided has proven to be incompetent. I complained to LV= and registered a complaint. They redirected me back to their 3rd party. I explained my problem and said my contract was with LV= and that I had paid them a sum to provide legal expense, it was their choice to sub contract this out. As an example I said that when I purchase an item from amazon and their delivery provider fails I go back to amazon not the delivery firm as amazon have the obligation to deliver. I believe that this reflects the legal position I have with LV=. First of all am I correct? Secondly is there any contract case law that I can refer to that supports this?
Comment