I have a PCN case in a paid for car park dating back to Jan 2019 that has got to court. The district judge threw out the original case because the particulars of claim were badly drafted (amusing as BWLegal have been very snotty at my own amateur efforts at arguing the law).
I'm looking for advice on what to do next.
Should I definitely file an amended defence?
If so can I refer to discrepancies between the original and amended claim or is the original claim now entirely irrelevant?
Are they allowed to introduce any evidence/arguments that are not in the particulars in court - for instance they claim that the signage is clear on entering the car park but have provided one close up image of a sign that is not at the entrance and no evidence that this was the signage at the time. A google streetview of the car park shows no signage at the entrance. If I refer to this in an amended defence can they counter it with new images?
Any other comments /advice welcomed.
Thanks in advance.
Ewan
I'm looking for advice on what to do next.
Should I definitely file an amended defence?
If so can I refer to discrepancies between the original and amended claim or is the original claim now entirely irrelevant?
Are they allowed to introduce any evidence/arguments that are not in the particulars in court - for instance they claim that the signage is clear on entering the car park but have provided one close up image of a sign that is not at the entrance and no evidence that this was the signage at the time. A google streetview of the car park shows no signage at the entrance. If I refer to this in an amended defence can they counter it with new images?
Any other comments /advice welcomed.
Thanks in advance.
Ewan
Comment