Tweet
Why do they need to speak with you?
Loading...
-
I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here. -
If they have anything they want to say they can email or send under the cover of Without prejudice. So i dont see why they need to be contacting youI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.Comment
-
[QUOTE=pt2537;n1547283]Why do they need to speak with you? [/QUOTE
I have no idea why or what they wish to discuss. Any tips for me please?
Comment
-
-
I imagine they want to talk to you to railroad things by suggesting it could cost you a lot of money in their costs or that you don't have a hope in winning. They certainly would never put any of that in writing - letter or email.Comment
-
I agree because they didn’t seem keen to consent to the judgement being set aside when I requested it from them.Originally posted by ploddertom View PostComment
-
It has been posted here before. !! Do not phone them !!. Everything in writing.Comment
-
-
I do call my opponents, it can be useful, but that normally comes after i have entered into settlement discussions via email or letterOriginally posted by Archie.2 View PostI work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.
If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .
I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.
You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.Comment
-
The set aside hearing is next week. I’ve just received the below from the Claimant via email: I did make it clear on my N244 form that I had no knowledge of the debt.Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
Any thoughts please? Thank you.
"Having reviewed your application, I note that you were not served with the Claim form and therefore did not have the opportunity to accept or defend the Claim.
Would we be right to assume that you do not dispute the loan; rather just the fact that you were not served correctly?"Last edited by Micky10; 25th September 2020, 10:07:AM.Comment
-
Hi all,
The hearing is tomorrow, and it looks as if I have a gun to my head to sign a claimant consent document I received via email just now, to sign before 12:00 today. Saying “for all parties to save time and cost”. Please see the terms and advice. Thank you in advance.
1, The hearing listed to be heard on 29 September 2020 be vacated
2, The Judgement obtained on 10 April 2020 be set-aside and registration removed
3, The Defendant, do file and serve a fully particularised Defence within 28 days of the date of the Order
4, The Claimant, (if so advised), do provide a response to the Defence and
5, There be no Order as to cost
Comment
-
-
I have as of yet not received a response to a CCA request I made.
Comment
Comment