• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Consumer Credit - appeal a decision. CCA 1974 s127(3)

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Consumer Credit - appeal a decision. CCA 1974 s127(3)

    I need some advice in which solicitor is able to take on a case where an appeal is required from a decision in the SCT by a DDJ.

    agreement is 2000 so s127(3) applies. The judge however used the prejudice argument as to why agreement enforceable.

    It’s a complex claim. DN refers to the wrong clauses and assignment of debt issues too.

    any solicitors offer a CFA for this?


    Tags: None

  • #2
    Originally posted by Guest View Post
    I need some advice in which solicitor is able to take on a case where an appeal is required from a decision in the SCT by a DDJ.

    agreement is 2000 so s127(3) applies. The judge however used the prejudice argument as to why agreement enforceable.

    It’s a complex claim. DN refers to the wrong clauses and assignment of debt issues too.

    any solicitors offer a CFA for this?

    Yes, If the Judge allowed prejudice to get around 127(3) then he or she is wrong. Happy to talk this through if needed
    I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

    If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

    I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

    You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by pt2537 View Post

      Yes, If the Judge allowed prejudice to get around 127(3) then he or she is wrong. Happy to talk this through if needed
      Just to add, prejudice only applies to the provisions of 127(1) and (2) not subsection (3)

      I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

      If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

      I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

      You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
      Working...
      X