• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

N260 Statement of Costs (Summary Assessment) Query

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • N260 Statement of Costs (Summary Assessment) Query

    Hi everyone,

    My first query, so please bare with me.

    I have a small claims court hearing tomorrow (via telephone) in relation to a copyright infringer. The defendant's solicitor has this afternoon emailed a N260 Statement of Costs (Summary Assessment) which totals to just over 4K.*

    I have two questions. First, I was under the impression that win or lose, the claimant would not have to bare the brunt of the other sides legal costs (solicitors, etc.) as per CPR 27.14?? Secondly, to enable a summary assessment to take place all parties must have filed and served a statement of costs no later than 24 hours before the hearing is listed to take place. The hearing is at 12pm tomorrow and I got this document at 1408 today so past the deadline

    As the claimant in this case can I ask the judge to throw this out, or will I still be liable to pay their costs. 4K is a lot of money to pay and as a freelance photographer I dont have that readily available!

    Thanks everyone
    Tags: None

  • #2
    The Court of Appeal in Dammermann v Lanyon Bowdler LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 269 (12 April 2017)
    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/269.html

    confirmed that the Ridehalgh test applies to CPR 27.14(2)(g) and cited Sir Thomas Bingham MR’s comments that “The acid test is whether the conduct permits of a reasonable explanation…If so, the course adopted may be regarded as optimistic…but it is not unreasonable”.

    The Court was at pains to emphasise that parties on the small claims track (many of whom act in person) should not be deterred from litigating due to a fear that simply by pursuing their case they will be penalised in costs. As the Court determined “Litigants in person should not be in a better position than legal representatives but neither should they be in any worse position…

    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pr...l/rules/part27

    In a nutshell, your opponent would have to demonstrate that you behaved unreasonably - but the judge, of his own motion, can also decide that you behaved unreasonably - and give reasons for so deciding.





    *

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you EFPOM, much appreciated!

      Comment


      • #4
        Let us know how the hearing went.

        Comment


        • #5
          The case was waiting to be allocated to a track and so the judge has awarded costs to the defendant. :-(
          I am thinking of discontinuing the case as I am haemorrhaging money over this. Bitter pill to swallow but such is.*

          To discontinue a claim/case is it just a case of filing a N279 form and sending to all parties? I take it there is no fee involved?

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X