Tweet
Hi guys , new to this so here goes . I am a lip and involved in my own personal injury claim that if won is quite sub, I am left disabled quite seriously over a fall off a ladder at a customers house . His insurance company has taken up the battle.* I have filed a N1 form but only naively followed the guidelines that came with the form. Now the defendants insurance has filed for a strike out due to my date of birth not being on the form and also medical prognosis and losses* *I have applied and sent a amended particulars of claim ,not the statement but just to add what I missed out As stated above. I stated I could not expect how much to recover clearly on the form . The defence has my medical files already so they know the extent of my injuries.* The defendants name is spelt wrong with 3 different abbreviations of it on the defence and the application to strike it out . They have also changed a very important word from " can to could from the original statement of truth. Any advice would be great guys . My hearing for application for amendment of my claim is on the 2 April and so us theirs for a strike out . Thanks*
Loading...
-
Tags: None -
Hi there and welcome. Just a very simple question for starters: why are you self representing a personal injury claim? This is literally the one area of law where solicitors always act Conditional Fee Agreement and recover costs from opponent in addition to any money/compensation you recover."Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012
)
I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007
If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page
If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com -
Thanks you for your reply....Originally posted by Celestine View Post
My previous solicitor said it was a 50 50 case and therefore did not want to take it further . Since then I have in possession his statement truth obtained from his insurance company before I even made a claim , my previous solicitor did not even have it Why this was sent I don't know when asked for it* As said his Christian name is spelt wrong 3 times and words have been changed to suit . Times in the defendants statement of truth do not fit my statement of truth.* I have evidence of the product on his surface where the accident occurred is 2 years out of date,* and when it was applied by him it was applied incorrectly.* My passion to plea this case myself . I have nothing to lose , I have no money or possessions,* saving and I'm most likely to be on benefits for the rest of my life . So if they do push for cost I simply cannot afford it.* The N1 form I filled in I simply was guided by the notes that came with it . Thanks for replying*Comment
Comment