County Court judgement as I missed chance to defend

[itm]

Hi all, new here and would like some advice please. Not sure which topic this should be posted in. Please explain abbreviations (unless I've used them).
This is a drawn-out and messy situation.

Early 2018 DCA 1stCredit via HSBC (HSBC called in a guarantee signed by the defendant) 1stCredit involved LesterAldridge as solicitors and sent Court claim form. SAR sent to HSBC and CPR-18 to sols.
Some toing and froing with ex160 and n244 and got a defence in.

Sometime after 1stCredit changed name to intrum and took over the case, they were late on one or two court orders but the court always allowed this and proceedings continued despite asking for it to be struck-out. The hearing was set for May 19 and defence had to be in by a certain date, mom was in critical care and out of the 14 days (where both parties must agree for an adjournment) an email was sent to court and Intrum requiring adjournment on that fact and Force Majeure, the court insisted on being paid and were not paid.

The hearing must have taken place as an order to attend for questioning was attempted to be delivered by hand (delivery man), this was refused as the defendant did not believe the hearing could have taken place.

A letter from the delivery man was received, highlighted in red "found in contempt of court for disobeying the order", the delivery man also turned up where the defendant works hand handed a suspended committal order for disobedience. Order to attend court 26 Feb 2020....next week.

The defendant must attend court and hopes the judge will use discretion to revoke the CCJ and allow a defence to be submitted. What line of persuasion should be used?

Other consideration, the defendant does not have any surplus income. And does not want a CCJ.


goodf.forumotion.com has been a source of advice and the latest posts are here (with documents) https://goodf.forumotion.com/t2086p1...endant-visible

The defendant has been temporarily banned for this https://goodf.forumotion.com/t4088-f...a-clarke#27644
One thinks bad judgement and live and let live, timing is bad however LegalBeagles is found

Many thanks in advance and I hope that enough sense can be made from this explanation, form a novice and layman with all (most) legislation

[R0b]

Uh oh, a freeman of the land forum and I've not read the whole thread but some of your replies on there suggest you support that theory, in which case why is the defendant (assuming that is you, even worse if it isn't) going to court on the 26th Feb when FMOTL theory don't believe that the courts have jurisdiction over them?

Or have I missed something?

[itm]

Great question Rob. Tis I/defendant.

I do believe that we should be under one jurisdiction, that of god, as all authorities/legal have to swear upon the bible (agnostic by the way and not getting into biblical stuff, suffice to say I don't believe in re---legion) and the first few commandments would lead to a peaceful life.

That said the legal and banking system has it's finely honed words to extort money from us for their financial gains (and seems most of the time by swidle), which is a battle and in any battle, it is utilising the correct set of tools. If their game must be played I'm all for learning, which is what I have been doing for many years now, but I'm a novice in this field and would like to know more..it is a system that I'm learning must be played by it's own rules. All advice is greatly appreciated.

[R0b]

I still don't get those who follow FMTOL as it seems like you only want to following the legal justice system when it suits, like this current situation, but hey ho.

An order to attend court for questioning is simply what it says on the tin. You are ordered to attend court so you can be questioned about your financial status, which is done under oath. It is usually done by an officer of the court, normally a clerk or equivalent but rarely a judge unless there is good reason - usually if you refuse to answer questions or don't attend on several occasions, a judge might decide to hold you in contempt and send you straight to jail until you agree to comply.

So if you are looking for the judge to set aside the CCJ then that ain't going to happen. You need to make an application to set aside a default judgment using the N244 form.

Unfortunately, because FMTOL don't believe in upholding the rule of law, I am one of those types who doesn't want to waste my time in helping them so that's all you'll probably get from me - you either agree to abide by the law, or you don't. There's no halfway house.

[itm]

I have simply been looking for truth, the way DCAs and banks work did not seem right for years then a couple of DCA issues arose so I started looking into it and looked at many sources from Lentz, Marcus Servent King, Cal Washington, Irish Detective and the Court on RT to name a few. Not saying freeman is the way, in fact, the way should be gods way but it is far from that. The goodf.forum has some interesting and learned folk, most that I have spoken with are not of the FMOTL ilk and respond to the legal system using its laws and holes within it. I did think there was a way (by determining the jurisdiction rather than freeman (as I evolve)) around the legal system but concluding that fire must be fought with fire. Unless one wants to step outside of society, which does not suit most of us I guess.

Thank you for your information. A second N244 can be submitted? If this was done Monday would it halt the*order to attend court for questioning do you know?
*