Hey thanks for reading. Helping a family post online as they're not PC savvy.
Cut a long story short:
Rogue trader ruined elderly couple property. Also managed to take advantage of their disabled son and nab his savings through trickery. They took him to small claims court and won.
The Judge and experts ruled in the claimants favour on almost all points and awarded nearly the entire requested sum (under £10k). The defendant made the entire process difficult because he lied at every opportunity, even to the court under a statement of truth.
Once the Judge ruled in their favour, an award was given which was meant to be paid monthly by the defendant.
It was a small sum but the defendant agreed he could afford.
The defendant paid the sum late on the first few dates and then claimed to not be able to afford any more payments.
The defendant tried to renegotiate the CCJ and when the claimants refused and asked him to refer to the court he threatened to call the police and sue for harassment.
The family are now hoping to move on to the next stage but are unsure what to do. They cannot afford further legal council.
Right now they need advice with ....the N316 form :
Where does this form lead ?
what additional questions should they request are asked of the defendant at the Q&A by the court?
Should they pass along the defendants threats to the court ?
What are compelling reasons to request the Judge who issued the CCJ to attend ?
Should the claimants attend ?
How long does this process usually take from form to q&a ?
Who informs the defendant as we read that a bailiff had to serve the notice to attend?
What happens if the defendant doesn't attend?
Or if they refuse to answer at the q&a or cannot answer ?
What happens if they lie ...as they have apparently mislead the court not over 70 times including the defence and trial ?
Can these costs be recouped as they are now struggling financially?
Do the claimants need to hire an expert or something to delve into the defendants records?
What happens after the q&a?
Anything else they should know please ?
Sorry for all the questions but the claimants are not legally minded but they have managed to get this far and hope to see it to some kind of positive conclusion where they can rebuild or the defendant can be stopped from causing further mischief.
Please help if you can or direct them to someone who can...thank you.
*
Cut a long story short:
Rogue trader ruined elderly couple property. Also managed to take advantage of their disabled son and nab his savings through trickery. They took him to small claims court and won.
The Judge and experts ruled in the claimants favour on almost all points and awarded nearly the entire requested sum (under £10k). The defendant made the entire process difficult because he lied at every opportunity, even to the court under a statement of truth.
Once the Judge ruled in their favour, an award was given which was meant to be paid monthly by the defendant.
It was a small sum but the defendant agreed he could afford.
The defendant paid the sum late on the first few dates and then claimed to not be able to afford any more payments.
The defendant tried to renegotiate the CCJ and when the claimants refused and asked him to refer to the court he threatened to call the police and sue for harassment.
The family are now hoping to move on to the next stage but are unsure what to do. They cannot afford further legal council.
Right now they need advice with ....the N316 form :
Where does this form lead ?
what additional questions should they request are asked of the defendant at the Q&A by the court?
Should they pass along the defendants threats to the court ?
What are compelling reasons to request the Judge who issued the CCJ to attend ?
Should the claimants attend ?
How long does this process usually take from form to q&a ?
Who informs the defendant as we read that a bailiff had to serve the notice to attend?
What happens if the defendant doesn't attend?
Or if they refuse to answer at the q&a or cannot answer ?
What happens if they lie ...as they have apparently mislead the court not over 70 times including the defence and trial ?
Can these costs be recouped as they are now struggling financially?
Do the claimants need to hire an expert or something to delve into the defendants records?
What happens after the q&a?
Anything else they should know please ?
Sorry for all the questions but the claimants are not legally minded but they have managed to get this far and hope to see it to some kind of positive conclusion where they can rebuild or the defendant can be stopped from causing further mischief.
Please help if you can or direct them to someone who can...thank you.
*
Comment