A company relayed information about me as fact and naming me, and all that is said carry's absolutely NO TRUTH.
This company named me as violent, abusive and have said "I forced my partner into sexual activity with my friends against her will".
I have this in writing, both me and my partner know this is not true, and in all likelihood, a mix-up of her ex-partner many many moons ago. I have no criminal record or police cautions ect.
I wrote to the company many times, including providing copy's of the said statements naming myself, in hope to resolve this, without any response from them.
I notified them of intended prosecution, to which they finally replied "our response remains the same, we are not at liberty to discuss this".
I then issued a money claim online, and today received a response from they'r solicitor.
Why they disagree with the claim
The Claim - procedural irregularities We understand the Civil Money Claims Service is an online service for all specified money claims valued below £10,000. The Claimant is claiming damages not limited to £10,000 (We refer to section 3 of his online form,) The Claimant’s claim is not for a specified sum.
The Claimant’s claim should have been issued under part 7 of the CPR. Under part 2.9 of the CPR, a claim for damages defamation may not be started in the County Court and must be issued in the High Court.
Finally, the allegations must comply with the detail required by Part 53 and the accompanying Practice Direction for defamation claims. The Claimant’s online claim form does not comply.
The Claimant has referred to a statement made by the Defendant. He has not set out where, when or by whom this statement was made and whether it was in writing, verbally made or both and how this statement has caused the alleged losses.
As for the claim not being limited to £10,000, I don't know where they got this from..
Any advice please, are the just trying to confuse me with jargon?
Thanks in advance...
This company named me as violent, abusive and have said "I forced my partner into sexual activity with my friends against her will".
I have this in writing, both me and my partner know this is not true, and in all likelihood, a mix-up of her ex-partner many many moons ago. I have no criminal record or police cautions ect.
I wrote to the company many times, including providing copy's of the said statements naming myself, in hope to resolve this, without any response from them.
I notified them of intended prosecution, to which they finally replied "our response remains the same, we are not at liberty to discuss this".
I then issued a money claim online, and today received a response from they'r solicitor.
Why they disagree with the claim
The Claim - procedural irregularities We understand the Civil Money Claims Service is an online service for all specified money claims valued below £10,000. The Claimant is claiming damages not limited to £10,000 (We refer to section 3 of his online form,) The Claimant’s claim is not for a specified sum.
The Claimant’s claim should have been issued under part 7 of the CPR. Under part 2.9 of the CPR, a claim for damages defamation may not be started in the County Court and must be issued in the High Court.
Finally, the allegations must comply with the detail required by Part 53 and the accompanying Practice Direction for defamation claims. The Claimant’s online claim form does not comply.
The Claimant has referred to a statement made by the Defendant. He has not set out where, when or by whom this statement was made and whether it was in writing, verbally made or both and how this statement has caused the alleged losses.
As for the claim not being limited to £10,000, I don't know where they got this from..
Any advice please, are the just trying to confuse me with jargon?
Thanks in advance...
Comment