Right. I have a question. Here's the background.
I was at Uni. I made a complaint to the University about a fellow student. The Uni did nothing, so I made a formal complaint (Called a Stage 3 complaint) to the Uni about themselves.
The case (To me) about Student A is a slam dunk. She has been sending hate mails about me to Faculty since the day I first sat in class. She made numerous accusations that are (to be frank) absurd. My two personal favourites are: "Doug used the word "Prostitute" in a private conversation with a tutor" and "Doug went to Iceland, and this caused me so much stress I had a seizure.". There's also demands that I be removed from class or she will kill herself.
I think it goes without saying. The University has NEVER had cause to raise any form of disciplinary action against me (No verbal warning, no written, etc) . I would also add, in all fairness, that I am Scottish, and my accent in the West Country, is not liked.
The case against the University is more complex, but basically comes down to "favoritism" (I.e., Student A is the teachers pet) but basically they haven't done anything despite the clear evidence.
I have received TWO letters from the same lawyer, one marked "Our client, Student A", and another marked "Our Client University B" - making all sorts of absurd threats (I'm to be arrested for defamation, etc.).
Now, surely that can't be legal? One lawyer, two clients (On different cases) aimed at the same person?
I'm thinking, if it goes to court, the defence to any case will be that Student A and Uni B colluded in an unlawful prosecution.
Any ideas?
I was at Uni. I made a complaint to the University about a fellow student. The Uni did nothing, so I made a formal complaint (Called a Stage 3 complaint) to the Uni about themselves.
The case (To me) about Student A is a slam dunk. She has been sending hate mails about me to Faculty since the day I first sat in class. She made numerous accusations that are (to be frank) absurd. My two personal favourites are: "Doug used the word "Prostitute" in a private conversation with a tutor" and "Doug went to Iceland, and this caused me so much stress I had a seizure.". There's also demands that I be removed from class or she will kill herself.
I think it goes without saying. The University has NEVER had cause to raise any form of disciplinary action against me (No verbal warning, no written, etc) . I would also add, in all fairness, that I am Scottish, and my accent in the West Country, is not liked.
The case against the University is more complex, but basically comes down to "favoritism" (I.e., Student A is the teachers pet) but basically they haven't done anything despite the clear evidence.
I have received TWO letters from the same lawyer, one marked "Our client, Student A", and another marked "Our Client University B" - making all sorts of absurd threats (I'm to be arrested for defamation, etc.).
Now, surely that can't be legal? One lawyer, two clients (On different cases) aimed at the same person?
I'm thinking, if it goes to court, the defence to any case will be that Student A and Uni B colluded in an unlawful prosecution.
Any ideas?
Comment