Hi
Looking for some advice as I have been chased by BW Legal on behalf of VCS since April 2016 regarding a PCN that was left on my car for parking in a business park. I was not the driver but I'm the registered keeper.
Initially they were ignored until the letters became more "serious". They disappeared for a while then had obviously decided on doing some house keeping and reignited their demands for payment. There was again some communication from me with my last correspondence to them being by email as below.
i received a letter direct from VCS 1 month ago and filed it away and forgot to respond ! I have now received a County Court Claim form. Do I just bite the bullet and pay or should I fight them ?
My last email response to BW legal :-
I write in response to your letter dated 21 February 2017,
As I have previously informed you I maintain no responsibility for this 'balance'. Your client, VCS, have written to me as the registered keeper of a vehicle, of which they allege that on 02/04/2016, the driver of that vehicle breached the terms and conditions of one of their car parks. VCS have failed to meet the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, and as such have no legal basis upon which they can hold me, the registered keeper, liable for this 'balance.' As I can not legally be held liable for this balance, I require BW Legal & VCS to cease processing my data. Please take this as a Section 10 Notice under the Data Protection Act.
In your letter you brought my attention to 'Elliot v Loake.' I am indeed acutely aware of this criminal case, whereby the registered keeper was presumed to also be the driver due to overwhelming evidence, including forensic evidence. I do not however see how this is relevant to a breach of parking conditions on VCS's car park. Should there be forensic evidence that as yet I have not been made privy too, I look forward to seeing this. Should it not be forthcoming then I will inform the Solicitors Regulation Authority that you are wrongly citing criminal case law in relation to a completely unrelated and dissimilar civil matter.
It should not be for an unrepresented member of the public such as my self, to point out to a professional law firm that they are trying to pursue a debt without the necessary legal basis to do so. Should BW Legal or VCS continue to pursue me for this 'balance' then I require an explicit and clear reason as to what legal basis exists to hold me responsible.
Should my request under S.10 DPA not be fulfilled, I will report you to the ICO.
It should also not be necessary that I, as a consumer, must remind you that your £54 legal charges cannot be recovered in the Small Claims Court. They are not my concern and I refer you to CPR 27.14.
Should you continue to pursue me for a 'balance' without legal basis, I will report you to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Regards
Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Rgds
DanHay
Looking for some advice as I have been chased by BW Legal on behalf of VCS since April 2016 regarding a PCN that was left on my car for parking in a business park. I was not the driver but I'm the registered keeper.
Initially they were ignored until the letters became more "serious". They disappeared for a while then had obviously decided on doing some house keeping and reignited their demands for payment. There was again some communication from me with my last correspondence to them being by email as below.
i received a letter direct from VCS 1 month ago and filed it away and forgot to respond ! I have now received a County Court Claim form. Do I just bite the bullet and pay or should I fight them ?
My last email response to BW legal :-
I write in response to your letter dated 21 February 2017,
As I have previously informed you I maintain no responsibility for this 'balance'. Your client, VCS, have written to me as the registered keeper of a vehicle, of which they allege that on 02/04/2016, the driver of that vehicle breached the terms and conditions of one of their car parks. VCS have failed to meet the requirements of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, and as such have no legal basis upon which they can hold me, the registered keeper, liable for this 'balance.' As I can not legally be held liable for this balance, I require BW Legal & VCS to cease processing my data. Please take this as a Section 10 Notice under the Data Protection Act.
In your letter you brought my attention to 'Elliot v Loake.' I am indeed acutely aware of this criminal case, whereby the registered keeper was presumed to also be the driver due to overwhelming evidence, including forensic evidence. I do not however see how this is relevant to a breach of parking conditions on VCS's car park. Should there be forensic evidence that as yet I have not been made privy too, I look forward to seeing this. Should it not be forthcoming then I will inform the Solicitors Regulation Authority that you are wrongly citing criminal case law in relation to a completely unrelated and dissimilar civil matter.
It should not be for an unrepresented member of the public such as my self, to point out to a professional law firm that they are trying to pursue a debt without the necessary legal basis to do so. Should BW Legal or VCS continue to pursue me for this 'balance' then I require an explicit and clear reason as to what legal basis exists to hold me responsible.
Should my request under S.10 DPA not be fulfilled, I will report you to the ICO.
It should also not be necessary that I, as a consumer, must remind you that your £54 legal charges cannot be recovered in the Small Claims Court. They are not my concern and I refer you to CPR 27.14.
Should you continue to pursue me for a 'balance' without legal basis, I will report you to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Regards
Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Rgds
DanHay
Comment