A person was found guilty of historic sexual offences, some dating back to 1963/4 no direct evidence was produced. Only the statements of the victim. Other persons who were present at the location at the time of the said offences could not be called to confirm or refute the claims. Each having passed away in the proceeding years. The defense barrister seemed to have taken it as read that their client was in fact guilty and didn't put up much of a fight. I sat in through all the evidence and points I would have questioned, were left. Such as: Person A, picked up person B in a vehicle and they returned to an address on a regular basis. In fact person A only ever had a provisional licence. Person A would never have taken this action. Person A is one of the deceased. I mention earlier
At the time of sentencing, the judge sentenced the "offender" to 18 years. This was two years ago, I have been made aware that the judge did not seek pre-sentencing reports of any kind and no such reports have been actioned in the following years.
My question is: As part of the legal process, should the said reports have been sought, before any sentencing was made
At the time of sentencing, the judge sentenced the "offender" to 18 years. This was two years ago, I have been made aware that the judge did not seek pre-sentencing reports of any kind and no such reports have been actioned in the following years.
My question is: As part of the legal process, should the said reports have been sought, before any sentencing was made
Comment