• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

kick em in the nuts

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kick em in the nuts

    I think it is about time we put the banks to bed over the charges issue, perhaps with the knowledge on this site, we can devise a way of taking the Director/s to court from 1 bank, for negligance of their duties to the company. as a former company director I know that it is the Director/s duty to make sure any company is running within the law. and if a complaint arises I.e unlawful bank charges, it is the director/s duty to investigate and or resolve complaints pronto. seeing as the banks have had 1,000's of complaints as they call them, surely the directors are in breach of their duties according to the companies act, and trade descriptions act, and need to be taken to court. I have asked this question on a few forums, and nobody can give constructive critisism as to why not. I believe we have the best of the best on this site now. surely we can devise a plan to kill this arguement once and for all. and move on to further consumer issues.
    Last edited by strangewayofsavin; 6th June 2007, 08:48:AM.

  • #2
    Hi strange

    In a sense you've summed up one of the core goals of the site, developing, testing and proving new legal arguments until we achieve our goals.

    We have the CI forum, the Consumer Fighters forum and Legalities, hopefully between these 3 areas we can develop new stategies. I think your idea is very interesting, the only concern would be, would we need a proven 'win' to say once and for all, 'charges are unlawful' before we can go after the directors for breach of duty.

    I would start a thread in Legalities or Consumer Fighters to discuss this further.
    "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

    I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

    If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

    If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X