Not grinding any axes here - a genuine question. Tonight I have been reading that the British are more tolerant than European neighbours with regard to supporting the poorer sections of society (http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/20...france-germany) Just after that I was reading a thread on another site where the OP was saying that she could not afford to support herself and her six children due to the benefits cap and changes in council tax benefit, despite the fact that after the cuts, her income would be in excess of £26,000 - more than many people earn from working. And we all know the stories of the person on disability benefits and a disabled parking permit who can jog to the pub or the shop when they run out of fags!
So here's my dilemma. I don't like ATOS either. I don't think that benefits provide many people with a liveable income. I know people cheat and exploit the system. I also know that others don't. I think we should support the less well off. I also object to paying for the indolent. So what actually is the answer??? It's easy to knock the government - well they just walk into it, don't they; and it's a personal hobby, I confess! But how would we do it better?
What would you do to make things fairer and more equitable?
So here's my dilemma. I don't like ATOS either. I don't think that benefits provide many people with a liveable income. I know people cheat and exploit the system. I also know that others don't. I think we should support the less well off. I also object to paying for the indolent. So what actually is the answer??? It's easy to knock the government - well they just walk into it, don't they; and it's a personal hobby, I confess! But how would we do it better?
What would you do to make things fairer and more equitable?
Comment