• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

yup Pt2537 is here now too

Collapse
Loading...
This thread is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

    Another PT convert. Wow, I didn't realise you were treated like you were Paul. Keep up the good work here.
    R

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

      Originally posted by Zazen.Warrior View Post
      They seem to gag anyone who 'challenges' them, I just wonder if it is one person who is responsible or has some sort of moderator group hysteria set in.

      I was 'under moderation' too.
      Weak leadership of a small but influential cabal of rampant egos is the sad reality.

      Originally posted by Emerald View Post
      You're just one in a long list of many - anyone who has ever been any use to CAG has been one way of the other pushed out. Put a fiver on Ell-en being next?
      Having better legal knowledge than they have and deep respect from the users are pre-requisites to being pushed out......so yes, it is relatively easy to pick out the next likely victim. sad
      "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

      I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

      If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

      If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

        I have been on moderation for a while

        No surprise as I was ripping the back out of the mods for allowing lowlifes to post,and PM ing all and sundry to dump CAG and come over here may have had something to do with it as well

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

          pmsl - you think ?
          #staysafestayhome

          Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

          Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

            I'm still dumbfounded that Lowells were allowed to post.

            Many people may not have great opinion of MSE, but Lowells tried the exact same thinq there.

            The account they registered was blocked/banned PQQ.
            Last edited by Nibbler; 1st August 2010, 14:56:PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

              Well hold on to that thought then because now they have pulled Scrivener's opinion.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                Originally posted by Amy View Post
                Well hold on to that thought then because now they have pulled Scrivener's opinion.

                Well that really is a new low.........to deprive CAGGERs of a QC's legal opinion, freely given to ALL Consumer sites to share is just appalling.
                "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                  lol

                  well, because they slapped me on moderation over or whatever they did to my acccount, i cant post the egg judgment even if i do win, they wont get it not because i dont want them to, but because i cant post it.

                  I aslo note that they have still left my thread on CPR 31.16 up and i have reported it 5 or 6 times now, saying due to Kneale it needs pulling or a statement making that it is no longer safe to do CPR 31.16 apps with the application i posted

                  its really bad that
                  I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

                  If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

                  I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

                  You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                    It got so bad over there that you werent even allowed to mention the CEO of Worst Credit in Reigate. Bob Kingdon. Even if you put *** ******* your post was cagbotted. It got like that with a lot of DCAs. The mere mention of their names was a nono

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                      PT perhaps you could put an explanation here thereby informing those from CAG who visit from time to time. Once picked up I'm sure the word will get around

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                        I can understand some of it, we get the odd email from people about putting inaccurate info on threads linked to names, it is usually okay if we organise for it to be corrected or anotated. I can imagine it would be harder to keep a track of on a larger forum. It depends how you treat people, if you email/pm someone and ask them to amend something, and explain the reasons why, then it isnt usually a problem.

                        Any way, we;re starting to sound like the Admin Zone forums here now.
                        #staysafestayhome

                        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                          Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
                          i did a thread over there on preaction disclosure

                          Since they moderated me, i asked to protect the users in light of Kneale v Barclays, that the thread be pulled, as they have no one over there who understands the proof requirements placed on the applicant

                          This is the thread why you shouldnt use section 77/78 CCA 1974 if you want the signed agreement - The Consumer Forums i wonder how long it will take, or if they will leave it up or not

                          If anyone applies for discovery they face a huge legal bill in light of kneale and i cant even post over there to warn them
                          Originally posted by righty View Post
                          PT perhaps you could put an explanation here thereby informing those from CAG who visit from time to time. Once picked up I'm sure the word will get around
                          I agree with that, a straightforward explanation of the affects of Kneale would be very useful to a lot of people (including me)
                          #staysafestayhome

                          Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                          Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                            Originally posted by ODC View Post
                            It got so bad over there that you werent even allowed to mention the CEO of Worst Credit in Reigate. Bob Kingdon. Even if you put *** ******* your post was cagbotted. It got like that with a lot of DCAs. The mere mention of their names was a nono

                            Vulgar abuse of individuals is NOT libel
                            ------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
                            Calling someone an effing ***** is not libel
                            Last edited by righty; 1st August 2010, 16:51:PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                              Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
                              lol

                              well, because they slapped me on moderation over or whatever they did to my acccount, i cant post the egg judgment even if i do win, they wont get it not because i dont want them to, but because i cant post it.

                              I aslo note that they have still left my thread on CPR 31.16 up and i have reported it 5 or 6 times now, saying due to Kneale it needs pulling or a statement making that it is no longer safe to do CPR 31.16 apps with the application i posted

                              its really bad that

                              PT, Tuttsi offered in post 30 to post on that thread, if you tell her what to post she will do so. I'd offer myself but I've been persona-non-grata ever since I not so tactfully told them what a bunch of twats they were
                              Is no longer here

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                                Originally posted by WendyB View Post
                                PT, Tuttsi offered in post 30 to post on that thread, if you tell her what to post she will do so. I'd offer myself but I've been persona-non-grata ever since I not so tactfully told them what a bunch of twats they were
                                Its ok, i managed to post what i needed to, i guess the moderation was a problem with someone pressing the wrong buttons
                                I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

                                If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

                                I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

                                You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X