• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

interesting reading

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • interesting reading

    I thought you would all find this refreshing!

    We should all do the same... :banana:

    A 98-year-old woman wrote this to her bank. The bank manager thought it
    amusing enough to have it published in the Times.


    Dear Sir,

    I am writing to thank you for bouncing my cheque with which I endeavoured to
    pay my Plumber last month. By my calculations, three 'nanoseconds' must have
    elapsed between his presenting the cheque and the arrival in my account of
    the funds needed to honour it. I refer, of course, to the automatic monthly
    deposit of my Pension, an arrangement, which, I admit, has been in place for
    only eight years. You are to be commended for seizing that brief window of
    opportunity, and also for debiting my account to the tune of £30 by way of a
    penalty for the inconvenience caused to your bank. My thankfulness springs
    from the manner in which this incident has caused me to rethink my errant
    financial ways.

    I noticed that whereas I personally attend to your telephone calls and
    letters, when I try to contact you, I am confronted by the impersonal,
    overcharging, pre-recorded, faceless entity, which your bank has become.

    >From now on, I, like you, choose only to deal with a flesh-and-blood person.

    My mortgage and loan payments will therefore and hereafter no longer be
    automatic, but will arrive at your bank by cheque, addressed personally and
    confidentially to an employee at your bank whom you must nominate.

    Be aware that it is an offence under the Postal Act for any other person to
    open such an envelope. Please find attached an Application Contact Status,
    which I require your chosen employee to complete. I am sorry it runs to
    eight pages, but in order that I know as much about him or her as your bank
    knows about me, there is no alternative.

    Please note that a Solicitor must countersign all copies of his or her
    medical history, and the mandatory details of his/ her financial situation
    (income, debts, assets and liabilities) must be accompanied by documented
    proof.

    In due course, I will issue your employee with a PIN number, which he/she
    must quote in dealings with me. I regret that it cannot be shorter than 28
    digits but, again, I have modelled it on the number of button presses
    required of me to access my account balance on your phone bank service. As
    they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
    Let me level the playing field even further. When you call me, press buttons
    as follows:

    1-- To make an appointment to see me.

    2-- To query a missing payment.

    3-- To transfer the call to my living room in case I am there.

    4-- To transfer the call to my bedroom in case I am sleeping.

    5-- To transfer the call to my toilet in case I am attending to nature.

    6-- To transfer the call to my mobile phone if I am not at home.

    7-- To leave a message on my computer (a password to access my computer is required. A password will be communicated to you at a later date to the
    Authorized Contact.)

    8-- To return to the main menu and to listen to options 1 through 8

    9-- To make a general complaint or inquiry, the contact will then be put on
    hold, pending the attention of my automated answering service.

    While this may, on occasion, involve a lengthy wait, uplifting music will
    play for the duration of the call.

    Regrettably, but again following your example, I must also levy an
    establishment fee to cover the setting up of this new arrangement.

    May I wish you a happy, if ever so slightly less prosperous, New Year.

    Your Humble Client


    (Remember: This was written by a 98-year-old woman; DOESN'T SHE MAKE YOU
    PROUD!!?.

  • #2
    Hi
    I've seen this before and thought it was fantastic.

    Comment


    • #3
      Funny letter, and a real one, but the circumstances described are not. From Snopes: The letter quoted above was one man's method of blowing off steam at having to deal with some of these exasperating aspects of modern banking. It was penned by Peter Wear, a columnist for the Courier Mail in Brisbane, Australia, for that publication's "Perspectives" column. The letter was not actually sent to a bank; it was a humor piece from start to finish, albeit one inspired by the author's having had one of his checks bounce. Though the item did appear in an actual newspaper, it was not, however, (as claimed in the Internet-circulated version's prologue) published in The New York Times. Mr. Wear's sardonic offering about the over-mechanized joys of banking as experienced by the consumer was written in January 1999. Since then, anonymous rewriters have been moved to alter his original to make it better fit with a primarily American audience.
      Borrowed from another website (thanks worldstart )

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
      Working...
      X