• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Bank case studies historic fees

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bank case studies historic fees

    The High Court is hearing whether overdraft charges going back years can be judged for fairness.

    More...

  • #2
    Re: Bank case studies historic fees

    Bank case studies historic fees


    Mr Justice Smith made his original ruling in April


    The High Court is hearing the latest stage of the case into the fairness of bank overdraft charges, by studying historic contracts.
    Judge Mr Andrew Justice Smith will determine whether charges going back for years can be challenged.
    The banks are set to appeal against his first ruling - that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) can assess whether fees are unfair - by the end of 2008.
    The current hearing is expected to last for three days.
    Significant case
    The OFT has been seeking legal confirmation that it can rule if bank overdraft charges of up to £35 are fair or not.
    Eight banks, which provide about 90% of the UK's current accounts, have been keen to oppose this to protect the estimated £3.5bn a year of income they generate from charging customers who go overdrawn without permission.
    Under pressure from hundreds of thousands of customers suing them for the return of their overdraft charges in the county courts, banks agreed to a High Court test case in two stages.
    The first was on the authority of the OFT under consumer contract regulations. The second will be on the fairness of the charges themselves, which the OFT has been investigating since April 2007.
    Tens of thousands of claims for the refund of bank charges have been frozen in the county courts since the test case was agreed.
    Looking back
    The current High Court hearing relates to whether overdraft charges levied historically can be assessed for fairness by the OFT.
    The latest High Court hearing is expected to last for three days


    The judge's initial decision - that the OFT did have the authority to consider fairness, which is being appealed against by the banks - only relates to current agreements between the banks and their customers.
    The current hearing will consider fees from the banks' old terms and conditions for current accounts. Meanwhile, the OFT is continuing its investigation into the fairness of overdraft fees and is expected to offer the banks its "preliminary views" by the end of July. The entire legal process is expected to last several more months.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X