Tweet
http://news.independent.co.uk/busine...cle3347982.ece
There take on the case initially is on the fact the banks have representing them the finest and expensive minds in the business to defend a purported £2.7 billion pounds a year revenue. It mentions that Geoffrey Voz QC is making his first appearance since he stood down from the Bar Council.
Rabinowitz maintained that fees were part of the basic cost of running a current account and were not punitive as is alleged by the OFT. It does mention OFT and credit card report and comments made by them which he argues was a partial cause of why people made claims.
There take on the case initially is on the fact the banks have representing them the finest and expensive minds in the business to defend a purported £2.7 billion pounds a year revenue. It mentions that Geoffrey Voz QC is making his first appearance since he stood down from the Bar Council.
Rabinowitz maintained that fees were part of the basic cost of running a current account and were not punitive as is alleged by the OFT. It does mention OFT and credit card report and comments made by them which he argues was a partial cause of why people made claims.
