s116 Certificate.Hi

[hayclan]

Hi, Who is 'to blame' when a Criminal Prosecution is bought against a person out of time (by 15mths) and then continues for another 9/10 mths to an Appeal hearing & only then discovered by the then, Litigant in person. Is it the fault of the Prosecution? their Barrister? or the Litigant in person's ex Solictor?
Many thanks.

[des8]

Re: s116 Certificate.Hi

IMO it is the prosecutions responsibility to ensure the case is brought in good time.
Having said that one would then expect any professional dealing with the case to pick up on the error.
Luckily you spotted the error (to do with issuing the certificate I recall).

In case your thinking of making a claim........hmm?

[Kati]

Re: s116 Certificate.Hi

Is this the same LIP/Appeal/Conviction as you posted about here (http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...gant-in-person) [MENTION=5659]hayclan[/MENTION]??

[stevemLS]

Re: s116 Certificate.Hi

And, before you ask, in the absence of malice there is no cause of action against the prosecution - people make mistakes.

[hayclan]

Re: s116 Certificate.Hi

Is this the same LIP/Appeal/Conviction as you posted about here (http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...gant-in-person) @hayclan??

Yes Kati.