Recently one of Beagles team members, Budgie, has received a positive judgement from the county court regarding the application of compound interest to a credit card overlimit fees refund claim.
District Judge Stewart sitting at Kingston Upon Thames County Court on 24th November 2008 handed down judgment which agreed the principles behind Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited) (Respondents)
v. Her Majesty's Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Appellants) apply when reclaiming credit card charges.
Extract from Judgment - full judgment attached
Full thread here - > Budgie v Capital One
:26:
District Judge Stewart sitting at Kingston Upon Thames County Court on 24th November 2008 handed down judgment which agreed the principles behind Sempra Metals Limited (formerly Metallgesellschaft Limited) (Respondents)
v. Her Majesty's Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Appellants) apply when reclaiming credit card charges.
Extract from Judgment - full judgment attached
15. It seems to me we are not concerned here with implied terms. Sempra is clear. The Court has a common law jurisdiction to award compound as well as simple interest as damages subject to the usual rules as to remoteness, mitigation and so forth. Similarly applying Sempra the court has a power to award compound interest whereas here the Claimant has sought a restitutary remedy for the time value of money paid under a mistake
16. Having reached this threshold I find for Claimant on the issue as to whether he is able to claim compound interest...
16. Having reached this threshold I find for Claimant on the issue as to whether he is able to claim compound interest...
:26:
Comment