• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Bank Oversdraft Charges Case Explained By Sky News' Joel Hill

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bank Oversdraft Charges Case Explained By Sky News' Joel Hill

    There's an awful lot riding on the outcome of this case, and not just for anyone who has ever written a cheque that has bounced or breached their agreed overdraft facility.

    More...

  • #2
    Re: Bank Oversdraft Charges Case Explained By Sky News' Joel Hill

    for those who dont click links (eh xena ;-)

    <H1 class=main-headline>How Bank Charges Case Will Affect You

    Updated:10:50, Thursday April 24, 2008
    <H2>There's an awful lot riding on the outcome of this case, and not just for anyone who has ever written a cheque that has bounced or breached their agreed overdraft facility.

    </H2> Defeat could cost banks billions

    Thirty pounds. That's what the average bank will charge you if you go over your overdraft limit.
    The fees are intended as a punishment but they've also proved profitable, generating up to £3.5bn for the banks every year.
    If the High Court verdict goes against the banks they may have to give that money back.
    There are the seven banks and one building society - the Nationwide - involved in this test case.
    Advertisement



    They argue their charges are perfectly legitimate and easily avoided if customers manage their money properly.
    The Office of Fair Trading argues these are not "service" charges but "penalty" charges.
    Under consumer laws it argues banks are entitled to charge such a fee but that it should be proportionate.
    Does it really cost the bank £30 to bounce a cheque? Some experts have estimated the cost could be as little as £2.50.
    OFT said charges against law

    The banks have always insisted their charges are fair but until this case began last July they tended to pay-up when faced with legal action.
    Take the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, which owns Natwest.
    According to its most recent annual report, in the first half of 2007 it gave back £119m to customers who contested penalty fees.
    Nationwide was also involved

    Chris Warner, an in-house lawyer with Which?, feels anyone who has lodged a claim with their bank will have to wait a little while yet to find out if they will get their money back.
    "There will be appeals", he says "this saga will drag on for some time yet".
    Marie Cope is happy to bide her time. She says she breached he overdraft several times by a matter of pence and was charged £120.00 by Barclays.
    She is a full-time carer for her son and her husband earns £15,000. Every single penny counts for them.
    The outcome of this case could bring an end to free banking in the UK.
    Banks are already writing off billions of pounds of bad investments linked to the US sub-prime crisis.
    Now they have lost this case, they may have to hand back billions more to customers.
    But it's a fair bet the banks will find a way to make good their losses.
    </H1>

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X