• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Lowell Portfolio 1 Limited

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lowell Portfolio 1 Limited

    It seems Lowells have had an episode which has resulted in Memory Loss, and it appears to be a very severe episode too. Over the past year, Lowells via their solicitors BW legal have litigated a number of cases, some via stat demands others via proceedings. Many of those cases have ended in defeat for […]
    It seems Lowells have had an episode which has resulted in Memory Loss, and it appears to be a very severe episode too.
    Over the past year, Lowells via their solicitors BW legal have litigated a number of cases, some via stat demands others via proceedings. Many of those cases have ended in defeat for Lowells, either because of discontinuance or by being struck out, or by consent order.
    It seems however, on the cases that have been abandoned by consent order, which provide that the case is dead and will no longer be resurrected, letters have been sent out to the defendants seeking monies from them. Ut oh, naughty naughty Lowells.
    It would be very foolish for them to threaten to issue proceedings on such accounts. Arguably it would be a breach of the FCA authorisations, which they need to trade lawfully, and if they did issue proceedings it would be a serious abuse of process.
    There is a further question though that people would need to consider in such circumstances, that is, what has been recorded on your credit file? If the Claim fails, should a Default be recorded? it may be arguable that any Default should be removed as to record in such circumstances may breach Principle 4 of the Data Protection Act 1998 per Grace v Blackhorse.



    More...
    I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

    If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

    I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

    You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Lowell Portfolio 1 Limited

    Im sure you are looking forward to getting a case where you can remind the Leeds losers of their amnesia

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X