• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Q&A: Bank charges test case

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Q&A: Bank charges test case

    BBC NEWS | Business | Q&A: Bank charges test case

    Q&A: Bank charges test case

    A High Court judge is set to decide a crucial test case which could have widespread consequences for millions of banking customers in the UK.

    The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) believes the overdraft charges levied by banks and building societies are unfair and wants the High Court to rule accordingly.
    However, the banks insist their fees are legal.

    What exactly is the High Court being asked to decide?

    The OFT is challenging seven leading banks and the Nationwide Building Society about the fairness of their unauthorised overdraft charges.

    Customers are sometimes charged more than £30 for going into the red without permission, an amount which the OFT and consumer groups argue is significantly higher than the true administrative cost.

    However, the OFT will not ask the judge to make a straightforward ruling that the banks' charges are unfair.

    BANK REFUNDS IN 2007
    Barclays - £87m
    HSBC - £116m
    HBOS - £79m
    Lloyds TSB - £36m
    RBS - £81m
    Source: Bank interim results

    Instead it will argue that the overdraft charges come under the scope of the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.

    This would mean the OFT would have the authority to decide itself if the charges are unfair, and the power to force the banks to change their practices as a result.
    The regulator will also argue that the banks' terms and conditions are not written in sufficiently plain English, something else that would give the OFT jurisdiction to act.

    For their part, the banks argue that their charges are a fee for a service and not a penalty charge, and also that they form a core term of their contracts with their customers.

    As such they say the Unfair Terms legislation does not apply.

    Why has the case reached the High Court?

    The test case was announced last summer, in response to an unprecedented wave of mass litigation which has swept the country during the past two years.
    It is estimated that banks have so far refunded about £570m to 330,000 customers who accused them, often through local court proceedings, of imposing excessive overdraft fees that were unfair and illegal.

    In the vast majority of cases the banks chose to settle the cases before the matter reached court. This has meant no legal precedent was been set.
    But the growing volume of cases led to an agreement between the banks and the OFT to seek a High Court ruling to ensure what the regulator called a "clear and orderly resolution" of the issue.

    What is at stake?

    Potentially billions of pounds and the future of free current account banking.
    If the OFT argument is upheld it could mean banks and building societies having to return billions in fees collected from customers over the past six years.
    In addition, some senior banking industry figures have suggested that the loss of income from charges - which the OFT estimated to be worth about £10m a day - could lead to introduction of monthly current account charges.

    Most UK bank customers enjoy free banking while in credit, whereas in many other countries current account fees are commonplace.

    Is the end in sight?

    Not really.

    The High Court hearing is expected to last eight days with a judgement being delivered by the court around Easter.

    But whichever side loses is highly likely to appeal, possibly all the way to the House of Lords, which means the issue may not be resolved until next year.
    And even if the OFT was ultimately successful, it would not automatically lead to payouts for customers.

    It is expected that the question of compensation would be dealt with by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

    Can people still claim against their banks?

    Since the test case was first announced at the end of July, most courts have been halting new and existing claims for the return of overdraft charges until the legal issues are settled.

    Some estimates suggest as many a million cases have been left in limbo.
    The banks are therefore protected, for the time being, from any new legal action in the courts and from any new complaints to the Ombudsman.

    The banks are also still covered by a "waiver" granted to them by the FSA at the end of July which says they do not have to make progress with any new or unresolved complaints about their charges until the outcome of the court case.

    But consumer groups have complained that the banks are still levying the charges against customers, and have urged people to keep lodging claims.

    These will not be processed but must be acknowledged, meaning customers' details would already be on the banks' systems should they lose the legal action and be told to pay compensation.

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    BBC NEWS | Business | Q&A: Bank charges test case

    Published: 2008/01/11 14:01:01 GMT

    © BBC MMVIII

  • #2
    Re: Q&A: Bank charges test case

    Thats a really good article and maks things a lot clearer.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Q&A: Bank charges test case

      Indded

      Perhaps the main question is why we are not picking these articles up and posting hem straight away - I found this by chance.

      If we are to be on top of the game with the fast-moving developments, then we really need someone to ensure that every morning the standard press sites are checked for sources.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Q&A: Bank charges test case

        not sure...we have the RSS feeds set up - I'll check the BBC one and Reuters ones are operating correctly.

        Done - hoepfully we should pick more up now - just having a look for a ticker
        Last edited by Amethyst; 13th January 2008, 15:03:PM.
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X