• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Letters: Eight long years in hock to the banks

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Letters: Eight long years in hock to the banks


    Delaying the reform for eight years shows just how much "in hock" this government is to the financial sector (Osborne's answer to the bank crisis – in eight years' time, 13 September). The organisational changes are already in place with most banks. The financial readjustment would take a little longer because the casino boys are dependent on our savings (but not prepared to pay a fair price) and would squeal as they are withdrawn. Osborne and King could introduce a gradual change by forcing the banks to pay an additional 1% on individual savings accounts in year 1; 2% in year 2; and so on until the savings interest rate is at least 1% above inflation. This would eliminate the grossly unfair situation in which savers subsidise investment banking, capital markets etc, and let bankers get used to managing operations in a safe manner.
    Derek Wharton
    West Kirby, Wirral

    • Why doesn't the government restrict the £85,000 guarantee on deposits to banks that do not expose their customers to casino activities? And to avoid a panic withdrawal, introduce this in a staged way (maybe halved every year until the new structure become mandatory).
    Bill Free
    St Albans, Hertfordshire

    • Interesting that the government can speed things up where it works in its rich friends' interests (eg dismantling the NHS), but not where it doesn't (reforming the banks).
    Jennifer Jenkins
    Southampton

    • The Tories are waiting eight years, hoping by then the recession will have blown itself out, public anger largely gone, and the reforms been quietly forgotten halfway through a glorious second term. That way they can keep their paymasters on side, and assuage public anger now.
    Dick Cave
    Cambridge

    • The proposals sound like cowardice to me. A truly radical shake-up would ban the trading of derivatives and hedge funds. The fact these trades distort the market means high street and investment banks will still be linked.
    Rod White
    Dursley, Gloucestershire

    • Now that casino investment banking is to be separated from the high street banks, why not ask customers if the high street banks could be reconstituted as a mutual societies? Rather in the same way as the building societies mutuality was mutilated by the carpetbaggers a few years ago? Could we have our cash back?
    Mark O'Connor
    Bristol

    • So, the good news is it is OK to have a banking crisis in the next eight years! Bonuses all round, eh?
    Howard Pilott
    Lewes, East Sussex

    guardian.co.uk © 2011 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    </img>
    </img>


    More...
    Tags: None

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X