• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

MPs expenses

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MPs expenses

    MPs are resisting demands from Richard Thomas, the information commissioner, to oblige MPs to detail how they manage to claim more than £20,000 on properties when they have no mortgages.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article2753503.ece

  • #2
    Re: MPs expenses

    I was reading an article on MP's expenses in the newspaper on Friday and I have to say I was gobsmacked by some of the amounts (yes I'm obviously very naive)

    MPs faced criticism last week when new figures showed that they shared a total of £87 million in expenses last year, an increase of five per cent on the previous year.

    The top-claiming MP for the 2006-07 financial year was the international development minister Shahid Malik, who picked up a total of £185,421.
    He was followed by the immigration minister Liam Byrne, who claimed £178,116.
    The cheapest MP was Philip Hollobone (Con, Kettering), who claimed just £44,551.
    Almost 150 MPs claimed the maximum £22,110 allowance for "staying away from main home".

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: MPs expenses

      Another example is the case of that Civil Servant Sir John Bourn, widely reported in the press for his extravagant expenses - £336,000 in six months - including first class air travel, sometimes with his wife. He also accepted hospitality from firms with government contracts, or hoping for them. Probably inside the law - just- but not fit to hold on to his knighthood, granted in 1991.

      This is of course, in addition to his salary of £164,430 again, met by the tax payer.

      Remember, this is the man appointed by Tony Blair in March 2006 to ensure that public money is spent properly and to advise ministers on potential clashes between their public duties and private affairs - and to investigate any claims that the rules have been broken.

      The words "snouts" and "trough" spring to mind here.

      Comment

      View our Terms and Conditions

      LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

      If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


      If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
      Working...
      X