• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Insurance 'racket' exposed

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Insurance 'racket' exposed

    From today's Times:



    Insurance 'racket' exposed: 'dirty secrets' helping the cost of motoring to rocket
    Motor insurance companies have been selling on the personal details of their customers to claims-management companies and “ambulance chasing” lawyers.

    Insurers have been trading in customer details, in the knowledge that this has contributed to a dramatic rise in claims, particularly for personal injury, and increasingly widespread instances of fraud, concludes a damning investigation by Jack Straw, the MP for Blackburn and former Justice Secretary.


    Insurers fuel the claims, even though they force up their costs because the referral fees provide vital revenue — between £200 and £1,000 per name.


    At the heart of the scandal are personal injury claims, the cost of which has doubled in ten years from £7 billion to £14 billion. This is despite a fall in the number of road accidents involving personal injury. The increased costs are then passed on to motorists in the form of higher premiums.


    Many of the claims are for whiplash, an injury that no scan or X-ray can detect. The cost to the insurance industry of claims for whiplash is £2 billion, yet the cost to the NHS of treating whiplash injuries is just £8 million.


    The scandal came to light as a result of investigations by Mr Straw into complaints from his constituents. He confronted two big insurers, which admitted that they were releasing personal data to claims companies. Mr Straw discovered that his constituency was one of many hotspots where insurance costs had soared. Insurance industry analysis shows a link between hotspots and the claims companies in the area. “This is not a system; it’s a racket,” he said. “The sooner it’s ended, the better it will be for the law-abiding motorist.”

    He has passed on his findings to Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner, who is investigating possible breaches of data protection law. Louise Ellman, who chairs the Transport Select Committee, said she would be raising the issue in Parliament. “This makes a strong case for a ban on referral fees,” she said.

    As part of a wide-reaching probe into the “dysfunctional” market for personal injury insurance, Mr Straw has established that motor insurance companies have been selling on the personal details of customers to claims management firms and “ambulance chasing” lawyers. His report also reveals that:


    • Unscrupulous advisers have been exploiting lax rules on proving “whiplash” injuries to drive a sharp increase in claims and payouts.

    • Insurers, many trading at a loss, have ramped up premiums for households in areas where personal injury claims, even legitimate ones, are rife.

    • The police and hospitals have been collecting fees for passing on insurance customers’ personal contact details.

    Writing in The Times today, Mr Straw calls for restrictions on the trading of individuals’ personal information. He says that the rules on whiplash should be tightened so that insurance claims can be made only when there is real evidence of injury.
    He also says that claims management companies should be much more tightly regulated and he demands a ban on so-called referral fees, where companies from insurers to roadside rescue businesses charge for passing on customer details.

    But in comments likely to prompt anger among hard-pressed householders who have seen their car premiums rocket by almost one-third this year alone, Mr Straw reveals how an industry executive admitted their role in passing on details of potential claimants.


    He writes: “I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers. I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment.
    “Then, said one of these executives: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’”

    Speaking to The Times, Mr Straw said: “It is gobsmacking. The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”


    Mr Straw has written to Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner, with his concerns. The commissioner, who has recently been granted wider powers, has agreed to examine whether consumer rights are being abused.


    Mr Straw said that wholesale reform of the personal injury market was urgently required. “It is the economics of a madhouse, where the law-abiding public is penalised,” he added.


    Mr Straw’s findings have sparked a call by Louise Ellman, the chairman of the Transport Select Committee, for a parliamentary debate on the costs of the car insurance market, specifically to involve a discussion of his report.
    They also prompted the insurance industry to renew its call for a complete ban on referral fees.

    Nick Starling, the director of general insurance and health at the Association of British Insurers, said that his members were caught in a “pernicious cycle”. He told The Times: “Everyone is doing this; it’s not just the insurance industry.” The providers of replacement vehicles, garages, hospitals and the police were all profiting from the referral fee system, Mr Starling said.
    “The ABI’s clear position is that referral fees should be banned. but the industry can’t do it by themselves,” he added.

    Mr Starling dismissed as “nonsense” reports that insurers were receiving £4.7 billion in referral fees each year.


    Mr Straw was inspired to carry out his investigation after voters in his Blackburn constituency began to complain of sharply increased car premiums. His close friend, Phil Riley, was also bombarded with phone calls and text messages urging him to pursue an injury claim after an accident, despite him being unhurt.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Insurance 'racket' exposed

    Great info!.

    Though do you know that this is the thin end of the wedge driving up insurance costs?

    As you know, the emergency services (police, ambulance and fire service) are paid for out of taxes for emergencies. Wrong. In a car accident, these services can (and do) claim back the costs for attendance from the insurance company of the 'at fault' driver. Im reliably told from an insurance insider that the costs for police and ambulances regularly outpace that of the fire bridge in accidents, and sometimes even out paces the costs of personal injury. So when you see the emergency services at the site of a car accident, they are not there out of tax payers money, they are there pushing up our insurance premiums. But you bet your bottom dollar those services will include car crashes as a reason for justifying more tax payers money.

    Another thing that pushes up costs is the actions of the police. First they are selling details of crash victims to 'preferred' recovery companies, who then bill the insurers (at exorbitant rates)
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...own-firms.html

    Then on top of that, when a car is stolen/recovered, the police take it to a secured facility and store it - and this costs well into three figures per day as I understand it.

    They keep it there until they have completed their 'forensic tests' and then release the vehicle to the insurer or owner. The problem is, the police tend to have a huge 'backlog' in forensic examinations, which results in literally thousands of cars sitting every day across the UK, costing insurers bucket loads of money. And you bet the cars wont be released until those forensic tests are done. Its in the interest of the police to have a backlog in forensics, as it actually makes them more money.

    The list goes on. We are paying taxes for these services who are then stealthily earning more money from insurers, who simply pass the cost on down the ladder to us as policyholders. Stealth taxes at work.
    Advice given is offered as personal opinion only. I always recommend you seek professional legal advice.

    Negative, I am a meat popsicle

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X