• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

    MIAMI--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The United States District Court Judge James Lawrence King today denied motions by a number of the nation’s leading banks to derail federal lawsuits consolidated before him in a Miami federal court seeking to recover hundreds of millions of dollars in wrongful overdraft fees charged to consumers on debit card purchases.
    “The collection of excessive overdraft fees, usually around $35 per transaction, impacts millions of Americans each year”
    In a 50-page opinion, Judge King found that Bank of America, Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, U.S. Bank, Wachovia and Wells Fargo, among others, were not entitled to dismissal of the complaints. Judge King rejected the banks’ primary argument that its customers cannot bring private litigation to recoup excessive overdraft fees.
    Judge King stated, “Plaintiffs have alleged sufficient facts—that, among other things, Defendants manipulated the posting order of debit transactions in bad faith so as to maximize the number of overdraft fees incurred.” Consumers pursuing these lawsuits, Judge King concluded, are “not trying to prevent banks from engaging in the business of banking, they are merely asking the banks to do so in good faith.”
    Plaintiffs’ lead counsel Bruce S. Rogow of Miami, Florida, commented on the Court’s ruling: “We are pleased the Court recognized the strength of our arguments and look forward to litigating these cases to a successful conclusion for millions of consumers across the country who’ve suffered these unfair overdraft fees over the years.”
    “The collection of excessive overdraft fees, usually around $35 per transaction, impacts millions of Americans each year,” explained plaintiffs' counsel Michael W. Sobol of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP. “While all bank customers have been affected, these overdraft fee policies hurt the financially vulnerable the hardest, often creating a domino effect, resulting in even more fees.”
    Responding to Bank of America’s recent announcement that it will cease charging overdraft fees on debit card purchases later this year, Mr. Rogow said: “The fact that Bank of America announced yesterday that these overdraft fees will no longer apply to debit card customers is a welcome, albeit belated, sign that change is finally coming. We hope the other banks will finally see the light as well, and all banks agree to return to their customers overdraft fees that the banks unjustly obtained.”
    The complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Miami, where all federal lawsuits brought against the banking industry for abusive overdraft fees have been coordinated before Judge King. Plaintiffs’ lead co-counsel Bruce Rogow and Robert C. Gilbert work with a Plaintiffs Executive Committee comprised of the law firms of Golumb & Honik P.C., Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Podhurst Orseck P.A., Trief & Olk, Webb, Klase & Lemond, LLC, and Baron & Budd.
    How Bank "Overdraft Protection" Works and Results in Excessive Overdraft Fees
    Today, when customers open checking accounts, banks provide debit cards for the withdrawal of cash from ATM machines and the purchase of goods and services. Many bank customers are not aware that as part of the process of obtaining the debit card, banks automatically enroll their customers in "overdraft protection." The overdraft protection kicks in if the customer spends more than he or she has in the account to cover the purchase, up to a limit of a few hundred dollars.
    Banks could simply decline to honor customer ATM or point-of-sale transactions if the account lacks sufficient funds, or could warn customers that if they go through with the transaction an overdraft fee will be assessed. In fact, until a few years ago, most banks simply declined debit transactions that would overdraw an account.
    "Banks do not record charges and purchases on ATM or debit cards in the order they actually occur," stated Mr. Sobol. "Instead, banks reorder the charges and purchases so that the largest charge or purchase is the first one paid by the bank. This manipulative practice is intentionally designed, the complaints allege, to maximize overdraft fee revenue."
    Further Information for Bank Customers
    Bank customers assessed multiple overdraft fees who wish to learn more about this litigation should visit www.bank-overdraft.com where they can submit their complaint to plaintiffs' counsel.



    Federal Court Rules Consumers' Claims Against Nation’s Leading Banks for Excessive Overdraft Fees May Proceed | Business Wire

  • #2
    Re: US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

    good read this http://www.bank-overdraft.com/pdf/20...raft-order.pdf
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

      Interesting stuff.

      Originally posted by natweststaffmember View Post
      ” Consumers pursuing these lawsuits, Judge King concluded, are “not trying to prevent banks from engaging in the business of banking, they are merely asking the banks to do so in good faith.”
      You can't argue with that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

        Overdraft Fees Suit Stays Alive in Federal Court

        Julie Kay
        Daily Business Review
        March 16, 2010







        A Miami federal judge has denied requests by the nation's biggest banks to dismiss a class action suit by checking account customers who claim they are being charged abusive overdraft fees on debit cards.
        Senior U.S. District Judge James Lawrence King's 50-page ruling Thursday keeps alive a closely watched consumer lawsuit that could be worth hundreds of millions of dollars and is shining a national spotlight on what plaintiffs lawyers say are egregious bank practices.
        "It's a really important decision because these banks fought long and hard to get this knocked out at the dismissal stage," said Bobby Gilbert, a partner at Alters Boldt Brown Rash Culmo in Miami and co-lead counsel on the case with Bruce Rogow, "The entire order is a major step forward for us ... allowing us to proceed to the discovery stage."
        Miami attorney Barry Davidson of Hunton & Williams, who represents Wachovia, declined comment, as did Aaron Schur of Aaron & Porter in San Francisco, who represents Bank of America.
        King's order granted some of the banks' motions to dismiss in some cases, such as claims brought under consumer protection laws in Massachusetts, New Mexico, California, Oregon, Montana, Ohio, Texas and Wisconsin. But some of the rulings were without prejudice, allowing customers to re-file their claims.
        "The few areas where the court granted their motion without prejudice, they pale in comparison to the overall tenor of the order," Gilbert said.
        Five class action suits alleging excessive overdraft fees were transferred last June to King. The multidistrict litigation has grown to include cases in nearly every state involving most of the nation's largest banks, Gilbert said.
        Defendants including Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Wachovia, JPMorgan Chase and SunTrust are accused of deliberately manipulating the order of transactions on debit cards through special computer software -- and in some cases sitting on transactions for days -- to maximize overdraft fees.
        A similar suit against BankAtlantic is pending in Broward Circuit Court before Judge Jeffrey Streitfeld. That bank was sued in state court because all its customers are in Florida, Gilbert said.
        If the suits are successful, he said damages could run into the hundreds of millions of dollars, pointing to a recent report by the Center for Responsible Lending indicating U.S. banks generated $24 billion in overdraft fees in 2008. Studies have shown the amount of a transaction that causes an overdraft is typically lower than the bank's fee for permitting the transaction when customers have insufficient funds in their accounts. The typical fee has been running $35, but some banks have lowered the fee in recent years as more attention was paid to their practices.
        The controversy over overdraft fees has already produced some changes. Bank of America announced last week that it would stop charging overdraft fees on debit cards this summer. Instead, customers will be able to use the cards only if they have enough money in their accounts. It's unclear if other institutions will follow the banking giant's lead.
        The banks filed a 100-page omnibus motion to dismiss last December, arguing private citizens don't have standing to bring such claims and federal pre-emption bars consumers from suing banks based on federal banking regulations, among other arguments.
        Oral arguments were held two weeks ago. King set aside most of the banks' arguments, ruling federal law does not pre-empt state law in overdraft cases.
        "Plaintiffs do not ask the court to tell the banks how to order transactions but simply that the ordering must be carried out as contemplated by the covenant of good faith and fair dealing," King stated in his order. "There are a number of cases supporting the proposition that when one party is given discretion to act under a contract, said discretion must be exercised in good faith."
        King also disregarded defense arguments that customers voluntarily entered into a contract with banks and agreed to overdraft protection terms, including the fees. He sided with plaintiffs in their view that the disparity in sophistication and bargaining power between customers and their banks "is obvious," and customers did not know they had the option to decline the overdraft protection service.
        If the litigation is successful, it would accomplish for consumer groups what Congress could not. A House bill that died in 2007 would have increased regulation of overdraft programs.

        Source: Law.com - Overdraft Fees Suit Stays Alive in Federal Court

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

          'Bank of America announced last week that it would stop charging overdraft fees on debit cards this summer. Instead, customers will be able to use the cards only if they have enough money in their accounts. It's unclear if other institutions will follow the banking giant's lead.'

          Well what a jolly good idea, why did no one think of this sooner PMSL

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: US Overdraft charges cases: Judge refuses to throw it out

            Originally posted by enaid View Post

            Well what a jolly good idea, why did no one think of this sooner PMSL
            Unbridled greed?

            Comment

            View our Terms and Conditions

            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
            Working...
            X