• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6936166.stm

    Wednesday, 8 August 2007

    Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

    Bank customers do not want monthly account fees even if meant the end of penalty charges, a survey suggests.
    The High Court is due to decide in a test case whether the level of penalty charges made by banks is lawful.
    If it rules against them, they may try to recoup money with monthly fees or by charging for each transaction.
    A YouGov survey of 2,116 people for website moneysupermarket.com suggested just 8% wanted a regular fee with 1% wanting a charge for each transaction.
    At the moment, people can be charged as much as £35 for going overdrawn without authorisation or for having a direct debit refused.
    The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is investigating the current penalty charges system.

    Pay-per-transaction system
    Some experts suggest that the money from these charges essentially subsidised the accounts of people who did not incur them.

    Kevin Mountford, head of current accounts at moneysupermarket.com, said free banking was possible "largely because of the number of people who are hit with fees and charges".
    If this was outlawed, a pay-per-transaction system - as used in many other countries - could become a reality for the UK.
    "We could well see the system prevalent in Western Europe, North America and Australia, where there are a certain number of free transactions and then you pay for any additional ones," he said.
    "We have already seen some providers abandon the concept of free banking by steadily introducing a bevy of charges on their less profitable customers."
    The introduction of such transaction charges could lead to a change in the spending habits of people used to making cash withdrawals or multiple card transactions, he added.
    These people were likely to make efforts to reduce costs, he added.

  • #2
    Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

    Well there's a surprise, how many of those people are the ones currently paying anything up to £900 a month incharges to keep the rest of the banking 'free'

    I'll be drawing out the whole of my wage on payday and paying my bills at the post office, any one who won't let me do that simply won't get my custom - easy!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

      Originally posted by iancognito View Post
      Well there's a surprise, how many of those people are the ones currently paying anything up to £900 a month incharges to keep the rest of the banking 'free'

      I'll be drawing out the whole of my wage on payday and paying my bills at the post office, any one who won't let me do that simply won't get my custom - easy!!!
      Thats what it will come to.
      Everyone will stop using all the new electronic means, and go back to cash.
      The system will go full circle
      Cash - cheque books - Chip & Pin - Cash

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

        I said that OTR ages ago, I got told that it would never work, as it didn't work years ago. I still think it worked a lot better than todays rip off system.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

          These are the details from Sky News.

          http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...279016,00.html

          Using your bank may soon cost the average Briton £300 a year in charges, if the free banking system is abandoned, according to research.

          Charges add upFinancial website moneysupermarket.com says pay-as-you-go banking may be introduced in the UK instead of the current penalty charges.

          The new system would mean people being charged an average of 32.9p for every direct debit and 34.2p for standing orders, it said.

          Withdrawing cash would cost people around 23.9p, a card transaction would be 53.8p and writing a cheque would cost an average of 44.7p.

          Bank customers could also expect to pay a monthly banking charge of £4.13.

          Under this model, the website said, the average person would face annual account charges of £294.63.

          Someone who carried out a high number of transactions could pay more than £500 a year.

          Most people want to continue with the current free banking system with high penalty charges for people who breach their overdraft limit or bounce cheques.

          Moneysupermarket.com's Kevin Mountford said transaction charges would prompt those who make multiple card transactions or cash withdrawals to change their spending habits.

          "At the moment, free banking is possible largely because of the number of people who are hit with fees and charges," Mr Mountford said.

          "The OFT's clampdown on this, together with politician Andrew Tyrie's call for more transparency in charging, could well be moving us closer to a pay-per-transaction system - but one that Britons will resist."


          The Office of Fair Trading is currently taking a number of banks to court to establish whether the high penalty charges they levy are fair.
          I am curious as to where they got those figures from. For example, if it will cost "an average of 32.9p for every direct debit and 34.2p for standing orders" then how does it cost £38 to not pay a direct debit or standing order?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

            Oh well,
            I always prefered the 'Cash In Hand' system, no vat, tax etc
            suits me fine

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

              Under this model, the website said, the average person would face annual account charges of £294.63.
              Bargain! that'll be about 10% of what us lot are paying at the mo then!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

                Originally posted by Cetelco View Post
                These are the details from Sky News.

                http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...279016,00.html


                I am curious as to where they got those figures from. For example, if it will cost "an average of 32.9p for every direct debit and 34.2p for standing orders" then how does it cost £38 to not pay a direct debit or standing order?
                A much better guide to real service charges has always been those applied to business accounts. Although business accounts have always been different from personal accounts in many ways, presumably the staff costs involved are similar.

                In 2001 I was charged 40p for each payment in or out (auto), and 67p for each payment in or out (manual). At the same time, excess borrowing, which presumably requires no such staff cost, meant £3-50 being taken every day, and the bank charged £30 to return a cheque or not to pay a DD.

                The actual service charges are clearly worked out to a complex system like CYNthesys that Clydesdale/Yorkshire use. The rest are equally clearly just opportunist figures by chancers because they could get away with it.

                K.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

                  Cash would be fine with me too. That is exactly what the Government and banks don't want but it is what they are forcing us to resort to in order to keep what little money we do have. My mattress can cope.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Monthly bank charges 'not wanted'

                    lol goldlady....mine too. if needs be I'll buy a bigger one!
                    I'll be able to afford it with the charges I'll be saving ...lol

                    Comment

                    View our Terms and Conditions

                    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                    Working...
                    X