Bank charges for unauthorised overdrafts are subject to regulation by the Office of Fair Trading under "unfair contract" rules, the Court of Appeal has ruled.
Appeal judges upheld a High Court decision last April that the fees charged to personal
current account customers are subject to regulation by the watchdog.
The ruling came in a test case brought by the OFT and major high street banks.
The banks argued that the charges were exempt from the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.
They insisted the fees were legitimate "remuneration for goods and services supplied" to customers in the form of overdraft facilities.
The banks are now expected to apply to the Law Lords for permission to appeal to the House of Lords.
The appeal judges advised that, pending a decision from the Lords and the outcome of any OFT investigation into the fairness of the charges, thousands of County Court claims launched by disgruntled customers seeking refunds should remain on hold.
Bank Charges For Unauthorised Overdrafts | Politics | Sky News
Appeal judges upheld a High Court decision last April that the fees charged to personal
current account customers are subject to regulation by the watchdog.
The ruling came in a test case brought by the OFT and major high street banks.
The banks argued that the charges were exempt from the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.
They insisted the fees were legitimate "remuneration for goods and services supplied" to customers in the form of overdraft facilities.
The banks are now expected to apply to the Law Lords for permission to appeal to the House of Lords.
The appeal judges advised that, pending a decision from the Lords and the outcome of any OFT investigation into the fairness of the charges, thousands of County Court claims launched by disgruntled customers seeking refunds should remain on hold.
Bank Charges For Unauthorised Overdrafts | Politics | Sky News
Comment