Who is responsible if there is a cost incurred to return the car?
I purchased the car on December 29th 2015
Car Broke Down December 31st 2015
Car has not started once in 2016.
...
Happy New Year! \o/
...
Sigh
Anyway, the dealer has agreed (verbally) to refund me for the car, as the fault has now been diagnosed (at my expense, I gather that I'm still liable for those costs regardless of the outcome.
I've requested this agreement in writing via email before I take any further action.
Issue is the dealer claims that it's on me to get the car back to him, and the car doesn't start.
The Dealer is located 75 miles from my home.
Is this accurate, or is he shirking his liability?
Is it only distance selling laws that require the seller to cover the return cost of defective items?
I find the above a little ambiguous due to the second in bold.
So, I'm currently stuck with a car that won't start, the cost of dealing with that, the cost of changing insured vehicles, the cost of a temporary warranty that didn't cover the fault...
This whole thing has been a buying a second hand car nightmare.
I paid for everything on my credit card, would it be viable to contact Barclaycard for them to resolve this, or is that not something that happens?
Also, I part exchanged my old car. Consumer Rights are again vague here as it if I have the right to request it back or not, or just the value I was given for it?
Assuming I can somehow get the car back to the dealer, if I was accompany it down there, I'm going to be stuck 75 miles from home with no practical way to get home.
Considering I feel I was under paid for the car, getting my old car back would at least go part way to recovering some of my losses throughout this fiasco (I accepted because being stuck with 2 cars 75 miles, the cost of dealing with that would be greater than the loss of value offered in exchange).
Any advice and clarification on my legal rights at this point would be greatly appreciated.
I purchased the car on December 29th 2015
Car Broke Down December 31st 2015
Car has not started once in 2016.
...
Happy New Year! \o/
...
Sigh
Anyway, the dealer has agreed (verbally) to refund me for the car, as the fault has now been diagnosed (at my expense, I gather that I'm still liable for those costs regardless of the outcome.
I've requested this agreement in writing via email before I take any further action.
Issue is the dealer claims that it's on me to get the car back to him, and the car doesn't start.
The Dealer is located 75 miles from my home.
Is this accurate, or is he shirking his liability?
Is it only distance selling laws that require the seller to cover the return cost of defective items?
Whether or not the consumer has a duty to return the rejected goods, the trader must bear any reasonable costs of returning them, other than any costs incurred by the consumer in returning the goods in person to the place where the consumer took physical possession of them.
So, I'm currently stuck with a car that won't start, the cost of dealing with that, the cost of changing insured vehicles, the cost of a temporary warranty that didn't cover the fault...
This whole thing has been a buying a second hand car nightmare.
I paid for everything on my credit card, would it be viable to contact Barclaycard for them to resolve this, or is that not something that happens?
Also, I part exchanged my old car. Consumer Rights are again vague here as it if I have the right to request it back or not, or just the value I was given for it?
Assuming I can somehow get the car back to the dealer, if I was accompany it down there, I'm going to be stuck 75 miles from home with no practical way to get home.
Considering I feel I was under paid for the car, getting my old car back would at least go part way to recovering some of my losses throughout this fiasco (I accepted because being stuck with 2 cars 75 miles, the cost of dealing with that would be greater than the loss of value offered in exchange).
Any advice and clarification on my legal rights at this point would be greatly appreciated.
Comment