Re: Say Hello to Simon
Curlyben you really have the bit between your teeth on this one! Well done for all the progress. Some very encouraging news for us poor 'victims'.
This is quite a big deal in our household, I came home form work on Wednesday to find my wife extremely upset and in tears following her experiences earlier in the day with Shoal Enforcement. Today she told me how she felt sick and distressed walking our 5 year old to school through the housing development where she was clamped. She feels as though significant wrong has been done to her (us actually as I had to earn the money to pay Shoal Enforcement before they would return our property to us).
Having discovered that the location where the car was parked is actually public highway makes all the difference and I believe moves this argument on from one of details concerning the location of signs and compliance with rules to a clear criminal act. I'm not sure what you call it when a private citizen working on behalf of a private company immobilises a legally parked car on the public highway and demands large sums of money to release it? Extortion? False imprisonment? Blackmail? Demanding money with menaces. Perhaps all of these and more.
Whatever the correct legal terminology my wife is suffering distress as if she has been mugged and relieved of the contents of a particularly full purse - a street thief would be lucky indeed to find a victim with £215 on them.
We both now feel that to right this wrong we need more than just our money back. An apology from Shoal Enforcement would be welcome but probably not sincere, so I hope this goes to court and we can expose the sharp practises of this parasitic company and get them suitably punished. This will add weight to the banning of clamping in England and Wales as will be proposed in the forthcoming Freedom Bill. Once we have evidence of the facts, particularly about who owns the roadway I think we should contact Chris Huhne (local MP and Government minister).
Thanks again Curlyben, keep it up.
Curlyben you really have the bit between your teeth on this one! Well done for all the progress. Some very encouraging news for us poor 'victims'.
This is quite a big deal in our household, I came home form work on Wednesday to find my wife extremely upset and in tears following her experiences earlier in the day with Shoal Enforcement. Today she told me how she felt sick and distressed walking our 5 year old to school through the housing development where she was clamped. She feels as though significant wrong has been done to her (us actually as I had to earn the money to pay Shoal Enforcement before they would return our property to us).
Having discovered that the location where the car was parked is actually public highway makes all the difference and I believe moves this argument on from one of details concerning the location of signs and compliance with rules to a clear criminal act. I'm not sure what you call it when a private citizen working on behalf of a private company immobilises a legally parked car on the public highway and demands large sums of money to release it? Extortion? False imprisonment? Blackmail? Demanding money with menaces. Perhaps all of these and more.
Whatever the correct legal terminology my wife is suffering distress as if she has been mugged and relieved of the contents of a particularly full purse - a street thief would be lucky indeed to find a victim with £215 on them.
We both now feel that to right this wrong we need more than just our money back. An apology from Shoal Enforcement would be welcome but probably not sincere, so I hope this goes to court and we can expose the sharp practises of this parasitic company and get them suitably punished. This will add weight to the banning of clamping in England and Wales as will be proposed in the forthcoming Freedom Bill. Once we have evidence of the facts, particularly about who owns the roadway I think we should contact Chris Huhne (local MP and Government minister).
Thanks again Curlyben, keep it up.
Comment