Hello
i purchase a used jaguar ipace from a franchised dealer via a PCP (finance) arrangement.
After 6 weeks ownership it developed a battery fault which requires a new cell.
The car is still driveable (“with caution” according to error message) but charging is limited to 72% of its capacity. This means range is significantly reduced from circa 230 miles to 160 miles.
This is at best inconvenient as I regularly do journeys of 160-170 miles so now need to divert to charge up.
The car has been inspected by a mobile jaguar technician who has referred a report back to the supplying dealer, who are not local and around 3 hr drive away.
The supplying dealer has advised minimum 6-8 weeks for part to arrive.
I do not think this is acceptable as is not in “reasonable time” or without “significant inconvenience” as per CRA 2015.
I would like to reject the car but the dealer thinks this does not apply as I am still able to drive the vehicle.
I would be grateful for any suggestions on how to resolve this. Do I have a valid case? I feel the average man on the street would find it unreasonable that a circa £25k used car would lose 1/3 of its range 6 weeks after purchase!
i purchase a used jaguar ipace from a franchised dealer via a PCP (finance) arrangement.
After 6 weeks ownership it developed a battery fault which requires a new cell.
The car is still driveable (“with caution” according to error message) but charging is limited to 72% of its capacity. This means range is significantly reduced from circa 230 miles to 160 miles.
This is at best inconvenient as I regularly do journeys of 160-170 miles so now need to divert to charge up.
The car has been inspected by a mobile jaguar technician who has referred a report back to the supplying dealer, who are not local and around 3 hr drive away.
The supplying dealer has advised minimum 6-8 weeks for part to arrive.
I do not think this is acceptable as is not in “reasonable time” or without “significant inconvenience” as per CRA 2015.
I would like to reject the car but the dealer thinks this does not apply as I am still able to drive the vehicle.
I would be grateful for any suggestions on how to resolve this. Do I have a valid case? I feel the average man on the street would find it unreasonable that a circa £25k used car would lose 1/3 of its range 6 weeks after purchase!
Comment