Good news! Burlington delivered the car back this morning.
I want to thank R0b for getting us through this. We cannot overstate how much you, and this forum, helped us. We called the "legal advice" line at our car insurance company and they didn't know about Section 27 and told us we should negotiate with the company to try and pay off the car loan. Not good advice.
One thing that this has made me think about is what a position of privilege we were in. I am internet savvy and have enough time to spend hours researching this, I'm a native English speaker with clear immigration status, neither of us has any criminal or financial records that would be problematic...the point is when Moneybarn tried to screw us over, we were in the best possible position to put up a fight, and it was still incredibly stressful and generally awful. I can imagine that a huge percentage of people who might be put in this situation wouldn't have won because they aren't as lucky as we are. So even though Moneybarn are essentially breaking the law, they are just playing the odds and hoping to do this to people who may be more vulnerable. So I feel very lucky, but also furious at what a bottom-feeding company they are. The guy from Burlington said to me, "they like to take the car and ask questions later".
The only thing I can say that I wish I had done differently is that we probably should have gotten the letter from the person who sold it to us sooner and just sent it to Moneybarn from the outset rather than trying to make the case that were entitled to the car whether we had it or not. I think legally that argument might have worked if we had to rely on it in court, but since we didn't have to rely on it, it would have been better (and cheaper) for us had they not seized the car.
In order for them to hand it back my partner had to sign a form saying we would not claim damages against Moneybarn. I am still planning on filing a complaint with the Financial Ombudsman and complete the internal one with Moneybarn which is still pending about their employee's actions. Is there anything else I can do to try and stop them from doing this to anyone else?
I want to thank R0b for getting us through this. We cannot overstate how much you, and this forum, helped us. We called the "legal advice" line at our car insurance company and they didn't know about Section 27 and told us we should negotiate with the company to try and pay off the car loan. Not good advice.
One thing that this has made me think about is what a position of privilege we were in. I am internet savvy and have enough time to spend hours researching this, I'm a native English speaker with clear immigration status, neither of us has any criminal or financial records that would be problematic...the point is when Moneybarn tried to screw us over, we were in the best possible position to put up a fight, and it was still incredibly stressful and generally awful. I can imagine that a huge percentage of people who might be put in this situation wouldn't have won because they aren't as lucky as we are. So even though Moneybarn are essentially breaking the law, they are just playing the odds and hoping to do this to people who may be more vulnerable. So I feel very lucky, but also furious at what a bottom-feeding company they are. The guy from Burlington said to me, "they like to take the car and ask questions later".
The only thing I can say that I wish I had done differently is that we probably should have gotten the letter from the person who sold it to us sooner and just sent it to Moneybarn from the outset rather than trying to make the case that were entitled to the car whether we had it or not. I think legally that argument might have worked if we had to rely on it in court, but since we didn't have to rely on it, it would have been better (and cheaper) for us had they not seized the car.
In order for them to hand it back my partner had to sign a form saying we would not claim damages against Moneybarn. I am still planning on filing a complaint with the Financial Ombudsman and complete the internal one with Moneybarn which is still pending about their employee's actions. Is there anything else I can do to try and stop them from doing this to anyone else?
Comment