Hello Mystery1 (Paul/Dave),
My wife has also received a 'Letter Before Claim' from Gladstones Solicitors for parking outside Sainsbury's in Brentford 'Outside of marked bay' - two incidents from 1st and 3rd October, 2015. This parking bay is 5 metres away from the Cybertots parking spaces, hence the post and interest in Paul/Dave's progress. The Letter Before Claim follows previous letters from PCM, then DRP, dating back to 2015, all of which we have ignored.
There is no regular parking fee in this area. PCM's claim is simply that parking outside the bay is sufficient for them to pursue my wife for £150 for each of the two incidents (the DRP letters listed £160 for each incident and the original PCM letter, £100 each). Regardless of the signage, would a reasonable defense be that there has been no material loss and therefore the claim is excessive? I'm thinking about the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.
Thanks for any views.
Moved from http://legalbeagles.info/forums/show...adstones-court
My wife has also received a 'Letter Before Claim' from Gladstones Solicitors for parking outside Sainsbury's in Brentford 'Outside of marked bay' - two incidents from 1st and 3rd October, 2015. This parking bay is 5 metres away from the Cybertots parking spaces, hence the post and interest in Paul/Dave's progress. The Letter Before Claim follows previous letters from PCM, then DRP, dating back to 2015, all of which we have ignored.
There is no regular parking fee in this area. PCM's claim is simply that parking outside the bay is sufficient for them to pursue my wife for £150 for each of the two incidents (the DRP letters listed £160 for each incident and the original PCM letter, £100 each). Regardless of the signage, would a reasonable defense be that there has been no material loss and therefore the claim is excessive? I'm thinking about the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.
Thanks for any views.
Moved from http://legalbeagles.info/forums/show...adstones-court
Comment