Hello all,
I'm mid-appeal with relation to a ticket received, whereby I was instructed by my friend to park in their designated parking space, but not given a permit by them. I appealed on the basis that my friend has primacy of contract, and therefore PPM can not unilaterally amend their leasehold, however they've disputed this on the basis that the leaseholder (who actually owns the parking space) was allegedly given the opportunity to opt out. Is this a legally valid argument on their part, as to my knowledge, this would still class as unilateral if there is no affirmative response provided by the leaseholder?
I'm mid-appeal with relation to a ticket received, whereby I was instructed by my friend to park in their designated parking space, but not given a permit by them. I appealed on the basis that my friend has primacy of contract, and therefore PPM can not unilaterally amend their leasehold, however they've disputed this on the basis that the leaseholder (who actually owns the parking space) was allegedly given the opportunity to opt out. Is this a legally valid argument on their part, as to my knowledge, this would still class as unilateral if there is no affirmative response provided by the leaseholder?
Comment