Tweet
Grateful for comments
I wish to bring to your attention the names of several firms of solicitors
whom I believe are acting unethically, and bringing your profession
into disrepute.
Their names are Miah & Co, BW Law. Wright Hassell, SCS, and Gladstones,
All of these firms act for Private Parking Companies, many of whom use
threatening tactics unlawful means, and deceit to obtain monies to
which they have no entitlement. Indeed one,of these firms. Act for
former clampers UKPC who have admitted tampering with evidence and
was suspended by the DVLA from accessing registered keeper data.
Some of these solicitors have been severely criticised by judges, one such
was at Scunthorpe County Court, where a solicitor, Miss Coates, was
threatened with imprisonment by the Judge, (VCS v Ibbotson, 1
SE098490) . Another solicitor. Michael Swartz has already come to
your attention. It is believed he is ignoring the restrictions you
placed on his licence to practice, and is still acting for a PPC.
Inappropriately quoting Beavis v Parking Eye, sending misleading information about
CCJs to appellants, claiming fees for more than the Law allows,
refusing to answer perfectly valid questions, delaying the sending of
documents to appellants, issuing non-compliant LBAs, issuing court
papers then backing down at the last moment, failing to carry out due
diligence, charging their clients for shoddy work.
There is also widespread concern about the IAS, the adjudication service
owned and operated by Gladstones. Their adjudications are unsigned,
perverse, and unfair.
There has been a spate of claims recently against registered keepers for
events which took place before POFA introduced keeper liability.
Elliott v Loake is often quoted. E V L was a ciminal case involving
a hit and run, false statements made to the police, and forensic
evidence, what has this to do with supermaket car parks?
All of this is well documented on the internet on Money Saving Expert,
Peppipoo, Legal Beagles, The No to Mob, The Parking Prankster,
Consumer Action Group, and many more.
The PPCs are not acting in the public interest and often in defiance of
the will of Parliament, one firm in particular appears to be
targeting the disabled . They are causing severe distress to the
victims, many of whom are old a vulnerable. I believe that there has
been at least one suicide because of such harassment
At present, being a solicitor is regarded by the public as an honourable
profession, but that could quickly change unless you put your house
in order
Yours etc,
I wish to bring to your attention the names of several firms of solicitors
whom I believe are acting unethically, and bringing your profession
into disrepute.
Their names are Miah & Co, BW Law. Wright Hassell, SCS, and Gladstones,
All of these firms act for Private Parking Companies, many of whom use
threatening tactics unlawful means, and deceit to obtain monies to
which they have no entitlement. Indeed one,of these firms. Act for
former clampers UKPC who have admitted tampering with evidence and
was suspended by the DVLA from accessing registered keeper data.
Some of these solicitors have been severely criticised by judges, one such
was at Scunthorpe County Court, where a solicitor, Miss Coates, was
threatened with imprisonment by the Judge, (VCS v Ibbotson, 1
SE098490) . Another solicitor. Michael Swartz has already come to
your attention. It is believed he is ignoring the restrictions you
placed on his licence to practice, and is still acting for a PPC.
Inappropriately quoting Beavis v Parking Eye, sending misleading information about
CCJs to appellants, claiming fees for more than the Law allows,
refusing to answer perfectly valid questions, delaying the sending of
documents to appellants, issuing non-compliant LBAs, issuing court
papers then backing down at the last moment, failing to carry out due
diligence, charging their clients for shoddy work.
There is also widespread concern about the IAS, the adjudication service
owned and operated by Gladstones. Their adjudications are unsigned,
perverse, and unfair.
There has been a spate of claims recently against registered keepers for
events which took place before POFA introduced keeper liability.
Elliott v Loake is often quoted. E V L was a ciminal case involving
a hit and run, false statements made to the police, and forensic
evidence, what has this to do with supermaket car parks?
All of this is well documented on the internet on Money Saving Expert,
Peppipoo, Legal Beagles, The No to Mob, The Parking Prankster,
Consumer Action Group, and many more.
The PPCs are not acting in the public interest and often in defiance of
the will of Parliament, one firm in particular appears to be
targeting the disabled . They are causing severe distress to the
victims, many of whom are old a vulnerable. I believe that there has
been at least one suicide because of such harassment
At present, being a solicitor is regarded by the public as an honourable
profession, but that could quickly change unless you put your house
in order
Yours etc,
Comment