Tweet
Re: Parking Eye v Beavis
'' At this point Mr Kirk accidentally called the charges penalties, which led to laughter all round and murmurs of 'own goal', and he then struggled to find any justification at all.''
lol, excellent.
'' Lord Justice Moore-Bick expressed the opinion that if ParkingEye were not allowed to manage the car park then disabled motorists would be seriously disadvantaged by able-bodied motorists pinching their spot. At this point The Prankster could take no more and scribbled stuff on his pad ready to make a paper aeroplane and throw it at Mr Hossain. Luckily Mr Carrod beat him to it, and as he was sat considerably closer was able to pass it to Mr Hossain, who was then able to inform the court that ParkingEye did not stop motorists abusing disabled spots. They were purely involved in traffic management which was dome by cameras at the entrance and exit, and which did not monitor disabled spots.''
Phew !
''The judges eventually called a halt to proceedings without the Consumer Association being required to talk at all. Judgment was promised at an unspecified time in the future.''
mwahahahhaaaa
(sorry I hate bandwagon jumpers)
So basically no one has any idea what the judgment will be, but the judges were seemingly concerned with the upset caused if PE couldn't charge penalties rather than the legality of them charging them ?
So 4 to 6 weeks till judgment....
'' At this point Mr Kirk accidentally called the charges penalties, which led to laughter all round and murmurs of 'own goal', and he then struggled to find any justification at all.''
lol, excellent.
'' Lord Justice Moore-Bick expressed the opinion that if ParkingEye were not allowed to manage the car park then disabled motorists would be seriously disadvantaged by able-bodied motorists pinching their spot. At this point The Prankster could take no more and scribbled stuff on his pad ready to make a paper aeroplane and throw it at Mr Hossain. Luckily Mr Carrod beat him to it, and as he was sat considerably closer was able to pass it to Mr Hossain, who was then able to inform the court that ParkingEye did not stop motorists abusing disabled spots. They were purely involved in traffic management which was dome by cameras at the entrance and exit, and which did not monitor disabled spots.''
Phew !
''The judges eventually called a halt to proceedings without the Consumer Association being required to talk at all. Judgment was promised at an unspecified time in the future.''
mwahahahhaaaa
(sorry I hate bandwagon jumpers)
So basically no one has any idea what the judgment will be, but the judges were seemingly concerned with the upset caused if PE couldn't charge penalties rather than the legality of them charging them ?
So 4 to 6 weeks till judgment....
)
. There is really no point in trying to pre-guess. We'll* just deal with whatever is decided on Thursday 
xx
Comment