• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

MET Parking Services

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MET Parking Services

    Hi all

    I recently visited a McDonald's to speak to a manager who was saving a happy meal toy for my son. When arriving the car park was chaos with people driving the wrong way round and no spaces, so I parked in the disabled bay (I know I know) as I was only going to be 2min.

    Turns out there was a camera monitoring and I received a NTK as below

    https://imgur.com/a/rOGqx5H

    Ive googled a few other victims of this and noticed theres grounds for appeal as it's a private company. I haven't replied to the letter in anyway so wanted some advice before doing so.

    TIA
    Tags: None

  • #2
    so I would write to them (no hurry!):

    Dear Sirs,
    I have received your Notice to Keeper xxxxx for vehicle VRM xxxx

    You have failed to comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of The Protection Of Freedoms Act 2012 namely, but not limited to, failing to specify the period of parking to which this notice applies as prescribed by section 9 (2) (e) of the Act. You cannot, therefore, transfer liability for the alleged charge from the driver at the time to me, the keeper.

    There is no legal requirement to name the driver at the time and I will not be doing so.

    I do not expect to hear from you again, or your debt collectors, except to confirm that no further action will be taken on this matter and my personal details have been removed from your records.
    Yours etc

    Do not identify the driver when communicating with them, nor on here as they are known to occasionally scan these sites
    They probably won't accept this as a valid appeal and you will have to go through the whole process, eventually even as far as a court hearing

    Comment


    • #3
      Firstly thank you for your reply. If it goes to court what chance do I have of winning? On what grounds can I appeal other than the can't identify the driver?

      Comment


      • #4
        difficult to say on what grounds you can win as driver.
        Note that appeals to parking companies are rarely accepted and in some ways are a waste of time and effort.

        It is easier to defend as keeper (already they have failed to comply with the statutory requirements, hence advice not to identify the driver.)
        If they pursue the driver In court they need to prove on the balance of probabilities the identity of the driver

        It is probable that the parking signs are deficient in some way, or they will add some form of collection charge to their claim or make some other error.
        Sometimes they win, sometimes they lose, sometimes they abandon the claim.
        Small claims are a bit of a lottery and there is no certainty for either side.

        Having said that, I would always contest a Parking Charge Notice, but fully understand why people will unhappily pay the "reduced" amount just to avoid the hassle.

        Comment


        • #5
          If it goes to court, and I lose how much more am I looking to pay? Rough numbers are happy. I'm all for arguing my case, but I don't want to make it significantly worse than £60. I'm not the keeper of the car if that helps in my case as you've mentioned

          Comment


          • #6
            If you are not the keeper, how did you receive the Notice to Keeper?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by des8 View Post
              If you are not the keeper, how did you receive the Notice to Keeper?
              Apologies, i should have made that clear. I'm posting on my wifes behalf.

              Comment


              • #8
                If it goes to court and your wife wins, she will pay nothing.

                If she should lose the award will depend ...........................

                The claim will probably be for £100 plus £50 costs or damages plus solicitors fee £50 plus court costs £35
                However the claim £50 for costs/damages should be excluded by the judge.
                If the defence argue the matter of those costs correctly, (and if the judge doesn't like parking companies) the charging of those costs could be ruled an abuse of process and lead to the whole claim being dismissed.

                Also these companies often initiate a claim but discontinue at the last minute or just don't turn up at court, especially if a strong defence has been filed.
                For them it is their business plan: a numbers game as sufficient people cave in to make it profitable for them to issue court claims like confetti

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hi I've received a reply!

                  https://imgur.com/a/aSOQtgL

                  Please let me know your thoughts.
                  ​​​​​​
                  ​​

                  Comment

                  View our Terms and Conditions

                  LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                  If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                  If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                  Working...
                  X