Tweet
Hi,
I received two PCNs in October 2019 from Havering Council. All the below applies to both PCNs, as the correspondences were at the same time:
Fast forward to February 2020, I file witness statements on grounds that I made representations within 28 days but did not receive a rejection notice.
The TEC cancelled charges.
Havering write to me asking for supporting evidence of representations that I made.
I email them screenshots with timestamps of the representations.
In early March Havering reply to me by email 'confirming receipt of email and both cases are now on hold pending an investigation. Please allow time for a full response to be sent.'
Fast forward to 18th June Havering write to me the attached: https://i588.photobucket.com/albums/ss328/pdottj/Mobile Uploads/20200630_164504.jpg
Now, it seems as though the sender of this letter is not up to date with both cases and is unaware of the TEC's decisions, as well as the email correspondence.
My questions are, 1) What should I do next? and 2) Is there a way to use their misstep to avoid paying for the PCN entirely?
Thank you.
I received two PCNs in October 2019 from Havering Council. All the below applies to both PCNs, as the correspondences were at the same time:
Fast forward to February 2020, I file witness statements on grounds that I made representations within 28 days but did not receive a rejection notice.
The TEC cancelled charges.
Havering write to me asking for supporting evidence of representations that I made.
I email them screenshots with timestamps of the representations.
In early March Havering reply to me by email 'confirming receipt of email and both cases are now on hold pending an investigation. Please allow time for a full response to be sent.'
Fast forward to 18th June Havering write to me the attached: https://i588.photobucket.com/albums/ss328/pdottj/Mobile Uploads/20200630_164504.jpg
Now, it seems as though the sender of this letter is not up to date with both cases and is unaware of the TEC's decisions, as well as the email correspondence.
My questions are, 1) What should I do next? and 2) Is there a way to use their misstep to avoid paying for the PCN entirely?
Thank you.
Comment