well i have received one of those failure to notify cons from dvla and landed myself to a court summons
ime fully aware of the interpretations act and have pleaded not guilty so no worries on that one
question 1
why are dvla using requistion instead of summons (explain difference please)
question 2
as this is a criminal matter, only the crown prosecution service brings charges before a court
where in the vehicle excise and registration act 1974 s.59 (2) (a) allows them (dvla) the authority to bring a CRIMINAL PROSECUTION and not a civil claim
ANSWERS ANYBODY
many thanks
ime fully aware of the interpretations act and have pleaded not guilty so no worries on that one
question 1
why are dvla using requistion instead of summons (explain difference please)
question 2
as this is a criminal matter, only the crown prosecution service brings charges before a court
where in the vehicle excise and registration act 1974 s.59 (2) (a) allows them (dvla) the authority to bring a CRIMINAL PROSECUTION and not a civil claim
ANSWERS ANYBODY
many thanks





the next letter I got was telling me they were fining me £35 I wrote back again telling him in few words to shove that idea as I HAD informed them, they responded with another letter saying the fine had now gone up to £50 this time I told them I was going to go to watch dog since they were always the feature company for trying to rip people off.
Comment