Got caught speeding 10 minutes apart on the M1, on a 5 mile stretch, by two separate cameras.
Magistrate had no idea what Double Counting was or Double Jeopardy, refused to engage with case law properly. Magistrate recorder (legal advise) barely engaged in the court discourse at all.
Basically got told by the Magistrate they would find me guilty as I was not disputing my speed, only that I was being charged twice for the same offense, as from their perspective every time a camera records an excessive speed regardless of any other factor, that in and of itself is an offense, (Not what the quoted legislation states).
Told to change Plea, otherwise implied would get maximum penalty. Coerced into it. However. RTA "same occasion" mitigation did apply when plea is guilty.
Watch out people. It seems Magistrates have minimal legal knowledge, and if you get charged on a low level offense where there is minimal to no case law directly addressing the facts, they are not interested.
Magistrate had no idea what Double Counting was or Double Jeopardy, refused to engage with case law properly. Magistrate recorder (legal advise) barely engaged in the court discourse at all.
Basically got told by the Magistrate they would find me guilty as I was not disputing my speed, only that I was being charged twice for the same offense, as from their perspective every time a camera records an excessive speed regardless of any other factor, that in and of itself is an offense, (Not what the quoted legislation states).
Told to change Plea, otherwise implied would get maximum penalty. Coerced into it. However. RTA "same occasion" mitigation did apply when plea is guilty.
Watch out people. It seems Magistrates have minimal legal knowledge, and if you get charged on a low level offense where there is minimal to no case law directly addressing the facts, they are not interested.
Comment