Hi all,
I am preparing to attend a London Tribunal hearing for a Moving contravention that was caught on camera, it was a no right turn.
However the enforcement authority has made many procedural impropriety. The main ones being:
1) Not printing anywhere on the PCN any form of address, telephone number, or website in how to send the appeal.
2) Sending a charge certificate 22 days into the 28 day period after sending the letter of rejection.
HOWEVER, the problem is that the only statutory grounds of appeal for a moving contravention is the below:
The adjudicator can only rule on the above. My question is:
1) Can i still win with the ground of appeal of There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the Enforcement Authority which is only for a parking contravention.
2) Why is There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the Enforcement Authority not an option!!
Thanks in advance.
mystery1 Kati ostell paulajayne charitynjw you have all helped me out before to which i appreciate very much.
I am preparing to attend a London Tribunal hearing for a Moving contravention that was caught on camera, it was a no right turn.
However the enforcement authority has made many procedural impropriety. The main ones being:
1) Not printing anywhere on the PCN any form of address, telephone number, or website in how to send the appeal.
2) Sending a charge certificate 22 days into the 28 day period after sending the letter of rejection.
HOWEVER, the problem is that the only statutory grounds of appeal for a moving contravention is the below:
- You were not the owner of the vehicle at the material time;
- The alleged contravention did not occur;
- The person in control of the vehicle at the material time was in control of it without the consent of the owner;
- The recipient is a vehicle hire firm and the vehicle in question was, at the material time, hired under a qualifying hire agreement and the person hiring it had signed a statement of liability for any Penalty Charge Notice issued in respect of the vehicle during the term of the hire agreement;
- The penalty charge exceeded the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case.
The adjudicator can only rule on the above. My question is:
1) Can i still win with the ground of appeal of There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the Enforcement Authority which is only for a parking contravention.
2) Why is There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the Enforcement Authority not an option!!
Thanks in advance.
mystery1 Kati ostell paulajayne charitynjw you have all helped me out before to which i appreciate very much.
Comment